Skip to content

Conversation

nason
Copy link
Collaborator

@nason nason commented Jul 17, 2018

This reveals real-world issues better than testing against src, although I'm not sure if this is the best way to do it, or if there is value in running against both.

🚨🚨Reproduces #199, and any v3 release depends on fixing failing tests here. 🚨🚨

This reveals real-world issues better than testing against src,
although I'm not sure if this is the best way to do it, or if
there is value in running against both.

Related to #199, fixing the failing tests here block the v3 release.
@nason nason added the bug label Jul 17, 2018
@nason nason added this to the 3.0.0 milestone Jul 17, 2018
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jul 26, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 2376c09 on test-lib into bc002db on next.

- Switch from microbundle to raw rollup (fixes #199)
- Upgrade to babel v7
- Set up test suite to run against src/es or lib based on TEST_LIB env var
@nason
Copy link
Collaborator Author

nason commented Jul 26, 2018

Released as v3.0.0-beta.4

@unrevised6419 unrevised6419 deleted the test-lib branch March 18, 2020 16:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants