Skip to content

Conversation

@tmnd1991
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@tmnd1991 tmnd1991 requested review from SpyQuel and andrea-rockt July 12, 2021 16:45
@tmnd1991
Copy link
Contributor Author

I know the test cases are far below decency threshold, I want to make them better, but I wanted a validation on the idea before doing that.

@tmnd1991
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SpyQuel I made a couple of changes, can you check if it covers your concerns?

Copy link

@eliax1996 eliax1996 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

from what I have seen it all seems very good, the only thing is on the signature of the functions where you see that the multi-connector was not thought during the drafting of the interfaces. Sorry I ended up completing it on Sunday but I've been busy with a busy week :)

@tmnd1991 tmnd1991 merged commit fb7a5f4 into master Jul 20, 2021
@tmnd1991 tmnd1991 deleted the feature/106-multi-connector branch July 20, 2021 12:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants