Skip to content

Conversation

@GeekMasher
Copy link
Contributor

@GeekMasher GeekMasher commented Dec 5, 2024

This pull request introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow to run CodeQL analysis specifically for QL code. The most important changes include setting up the workflow configuration, defining necessary job steps, and configuring the environment for the analysis.

@GeekMasher GeekMasher requested a review from Copilot December 5, 2024 13:23
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
actions/actions/checkout 4.*.* 🟢 7.3
Details
CheckScoreReason
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Maintained🟢 1012 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
License🟢 10license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Security-Policy🟢 9security policy file detected
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 3dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
SAST🟢 9SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
Vulnerabilities🟢 82 existing vulnerabilities detected
actions/dtolnay/rust-toolchain nightly 🟢 5.7
Details
CheckScoreReason
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained🟢 52 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Code-Review⚠️ 1Found 4/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Security-Policy🟢 3security policy file detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
actions/github/codeql-action/upload-sarif 3.*.* UnknownUnknown

Scanned Files

  • .github/workflows/codeql-ql.yml

1 similar comment
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
actions/actions/checkout 4.*.* 🟢 7.3
Details
CheckScoreReason
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Maintained🟢 1012 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
License🟢 10license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Security-Policy🟢 9security policy file detected
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 3dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 3
Packaging🟢 10packaging workflow detected
SAST🟢 9SAST tool detected but not run on all commits
Vulnerabilities🟢 82 existing vulnerabilities detected
actions/dtolnay/rust-toolchain nightly 🟢 5.7
Details
CheckScoreReason
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Maintained🟢 52 commit(s) and 4 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
Code-Review⚠️ 1Found 4/22 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Security-Policy🟢 3security policy file detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
actions/github/codeql-action/upload-sarif 3.*.* UnknownUnknown

Scanned Files

  • .github/workflows/codeql-ql.yml

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 suggestion.

Tip: If you use Visual Studio Code, you can request a review from Copilot before you push from the "Source Control" tab. Learn more

@GeekMasher GeekMasher requested a review from lcartey December 5, 2024 13:35
@GeekMasher GeekMasher marked this pull request as ready for review December 5, 2024 13:35
@GeekMasher GeekMasher requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2024 13:35
@GeekMasher GeekMasher merged commit bc5a760 into main Dec 5, 2024
7 checks passed
@GeekMasher GeekMasher deleted the ql-for-ql branch December 5, 2024 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants