forked from opencontainers/runc
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
libcontainer: Set 'status' in hook stdin
Finish off the work started in a344b2d (sync up `HookState` with OCI spec `State`, 2016-12-19, opencontainers#1201). And drop HookState, since there's no need for a local alias for specs.State. Also set c.initProcess in newInitProcess to support OCIState calls from within initProcess.start(). I think the cyclic references between linuxContainer and initProcess are unfortunate, but didn't want to address that here. I've also left the timing of the Prestart hooks alone, although the spec calls for them to happen before start (not as part of creation) [1,2]. Once the timing gets fixed we can drop the initProcessStartTime hacks which initProcess.start currently needs. I'm not sure why we trigger the prestart hooks in response to both procReady and procHooks. But we've had two prestart rounds in initProcess.start since 2f27649 (Move pre-start hooks after container mounts, 2016-02-17, opencontainers#568). I've left that alone too. I really think we should have len() guards to avoid computing the state when .Hooks is non-nil but the particular phase we're looking at is empty. Aleksa, however, is adamantly against them [3] citing a risk of sloppy copy/pastes causing the hook slice being len-guarded to diverge from the hook slice being iterated over within the guard. I think that ort of thing is very lo-risk, because: * We shouldn't be copy/pasting this, right? DRY for the win :). * There's only ever a few lines between the guard and the guarded loop. That makes broken copy/pastes easy to catch in review. * We should have test coverage for these. Guarding with the wrong slice is certainly not the only thing you can break with a sloppy copy/paste. But I'm not a maintainer ;). [1]: https://github.com/opencontainers/runtime-spec/blob/v1.0.0/config.md#prestart [2]: opencontainers#1710 [3]: opencontainers#1741 (comment) Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
- Loading branch information
Showing
8 changed files
with
80 additions
and
54 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters