Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to pass in openJ9 repo and branch #87

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2021

Conversation

renfeiw
Copy link
Contributor

@renfeiw renfeiw commented Jun 6, 2021

  • add openj9 repo and branch
  • minor format change by running npm format

Signed-off-by: renfeiw renfeiw@ca.ibm.com

- add openj9 repo and branch
- minor format change by running npm format

Signed-off-by: renfeiw <renfeiw@ca.ibm.com>
@renfeiw renfeiw requested review from smlambert, llxia and sophia-guo and removed request for llxia June 6, 2021 15:44
@karianna karianna added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 7, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@sophia-guo sophia-guo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

openj9_repo:
description: 'openj9 Repo'
required: false
default: 'openj9:master'
Copy link
Contributor

@llxia llxia Jun 7, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should use the new repo? i.e., eclipse-openj9:master

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Talked with @renfeiw , this is used as a check. It is not used for constructing openj9 git repo url, so it does not need to be changed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

openj9 is the OpenJ9 main code base under eclipse-openj9 : https://github.com/eclipse-openj9/openj9. I think openj9 is a correct one. Also I believe openj9_repo is set as the same way as two other repos do, which only use default as a flag. We actually don't need the default value as we can check if the parameter is empty or not. I will open a separate issue to do that.

Copy link
Contributor

@smlambert smlambert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@smlambert smlambert merged commit fd84730 into adoptium:master Jun 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants