Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move targets that take 30s or less to sanity #4322

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 10, 2023

Conversation

Mesbah-Alam
Copy link
Contributor

Since extended build runs only weekly, while sanity runs daily, it's a good idea to move fast running (e.g. duration <=30s) targets to sanity, to increase daily test coverage. This PR proposes to move the following targets to sanity bucket:

  • jck-runtime-api-javax_accessibility - takes ~23s on z/OS
  • jck-runtime-api-java_applet - 30s on z/OS
  • jck-compiler-api-signaturetest ~26s on z/OS
  • jck-runtime-api-javax_annotation ~30s on z/OS
  • jck-devtools-java2schema-DefaultMapping ~22s on Win
  • jck-devtools-schema_bind-bind_factoryMethod ~ 25s on Win
  • jck-compiler-api-javax_tools ~25s on Win
  • jck-runtime-api-javax_tools ~29s on Win
  • jck-runtime-api-javax_activity ~20s on Win
  • jck-runtime-xml_schema-boeingData ~24s on Win

Signed-off-by: Mesbah Alam Mesbah_Alam@ca.ibm.com

Signed-off-by: Mesbah Alam <Mesbah_Alam@ca.ibm.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@smlambert smlambert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good plan, thanks @Mesbah-Alam !

Copy link
Contributor

@llxia llxia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@llxia llxia merged commit d3eeb6a into adoptium:master Feb 10, 2023
@Mesbah-Alam Mesbah-Alam deleted the move-fast-tcks-to-sanity branch February 13, 2023 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants