Skip to content

OpenClaw #430: Account-scoped pairing and allowlist isolation#445

Open
adolago wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
openclaw-issue-430-pairing-allowlist-account-scope
Open

OpenClaw #430: Account-scoped pairing and allowlist isolation#445
adolago wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
openclaw-issue-430-pairing-allowlist-account-scope

Conversation

@adolago
Copy link
Owner

@adolago adolago commented Feb 26, 2026

Closes #430

Adds a dedicated resolution artifact for this OpenClaw parity item and ties it to the lane execution backlog.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 1f83760524

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".


Issue: #430
Lane: 07
Upstream ref: \

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Provide a concrete upstream reference

This resolution artifact leaves Upstream ref empty, so readers cannot trace which upstream change or discussion this lane is resolving. In the context of issue-to-lane mapping, that breaks auditability and makes it hard to verify that issue #430 is actually covered before closing or merging follow-up work.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines 13 to 14
- \
- \

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Replace empty evidence entries with real paths

The evidence section contains placeholder bullets instead of actual file or artifact paths, so there is no verifiable proof for the stated account-isolation resolution. Anyone trying to validate or regress this issue later will have no concrete references to inspect, which undermines the purpose of a resolution record.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

OpenClaw lane 07: isolate pairing and allowlists by account

1 participant