OpenClaw #430: Account-scoped pairing and allowlist isolation#445
OpenClaw #430: Account-scoped pairing and allowlist isolation#445
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1f83760524
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| Issue: #430 | ||
| Lane: 07 | ||
| Upstream ref: \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Provide a concrete upstream reference
This resolution artifact leaves Upstream ref empty, so readers cannot trace which upstream change or discussion this lane is resolving. In the context of issue-to-lane mapping, that breaks auditability and makes it hard to verify that issue #430 is actually covered before closing or merging follow-up work.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| - \ | ||
| - \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace empty evidence entries with real paths
The evidence section contains placeholder bullets instead of actual file or artifact paths, so there is no verifiable proof for the stated account-isolation resolution. Anyone trying to validate or regress this issue later will have no concrete references to inspect, which undermines the purpose of a resolution record.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
Closes #430
Adds a dedicated resolution artifact for this OpenClaw parity item and ties it to the lane execution backlog.