OpenClaw #428: IPv6 special-use/multicast SSRF guards#443
OpenClaw #428: IPv6 special-use/multicast SSRF guards#443
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: bc221217c6
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| Issue: #428 | ||
| Lane: 07 | ||
| Upstream ref: \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The Upstream ref field is left as a literal \, so this resolution record does not identify the upstream change that supposedly satisfies issue #428. That breaks traceability for anyone trying to verify parity work later, because there is no source commit/issue to audit against.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| - \ | ||
| - \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Both entries under Evidence Paths are placeholders (\), which means the document provides no concrete locations to validate the SSRF hardening claim. As written, this file cannot be used to reproduce or review the resolution, undermining its purpose as an issue-resolution artifact.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Closes #428
Adds a dedicated resolution artifact for this OpenClaw parity item and ties it to the lane execution backlog.