Skip to content

OpenClaw #424: CWD checks on approval-bound node execution#439

Open
adolago wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
openclaw-issue-424-node-exec-cwd-approval
Open

OpenClaw #424: CWD checks on approval-bound node execution#439
adolago wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
openclaw-issue-424-node-exec-cwd-approval

Conversation

@adolago
Copy link
Owner

@adolago adolago commented Feb 26, 2026

Closes #424

Adds a dedicated resolution artifact for this OpenClaw parity item and ties it to the lane execution backlog.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 574fe4f516

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".


Issue: #424
Lane: 04
Upstream ref: \

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Fill in upstream reference for issue 424

Upstream ref is left as a placeholder (\), so this resolution cannot be traced back to the specific OpenClaw change it claims to address. During parity audits, this makes it impossible to verify whether lane 04 coverage for #424 is mapped to the correct upstream source, which undermines the purpose of keeping a per-issue resolution artifact.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.


## Evidence Paths

- \

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Replace placeholder evidence path with concrete artifacts

The Evidence Paths entries are placeholders (- \), so there is no concrete link to code, tests, or docs that substantiate the stated resolution. Without at least one real evidence path, reviewers cannot validate that the cwd-boundary permission behavior was actually implemented or where to inspect it, which weakens the lane-tracking record.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

OpenClaw lane 04: enforce cwd checks on approval-bound node exec

1 participant