Skip to content

docs(color-area): reorganize README to follow documentation standards #5600

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

blunteshwar
Copy link
Contributor

docs(color-area): reorganize README to follow documentation standards

Overview

This PR reorganizes the color-area README.md to follow the established documentation standards structure, improving accessibility and consistency with other components.

Changes Made

Structure Reorganization

  • Overview: Replaced "Description" with "Overview" section and expanded component description
  • Usage: Updated import code blocks with proper language syntax highlighting (bash, javascript)
  • Anatomy: Added new section describing the component's key parts and basic usage
  • Options: Reorganized sizing information under "Custom Sizing" subsection
  • States: Moved disabled state information to dedicated "States" section
  • Behaviors: Added new section containing color formatting information
  • Accessibility: Expanded accessibility section with comprehensive guidance

Content Improvements

  • Enhanced component description to mention comprehensive color selection interfaces
  • Added proper code syntax highlighting for better readability
  • Reorganized existing content without removing any information
  • Added keyboard navigation documentation using <kbd> tags
  • Included screen reader support information
  • Improved section hierarchy and organization

Accessibility Enhancements

  • Added detailed keyboard navigation instructions
  • Included proper semantic markup with <kbd> tags
  • Enhanced screen reader support documentation
  • Maintained all existing accessibility features while improving documentation clarity

Testing

  • Verified all existing content is preserved
  • Confirmed proper markdown syntax and formatting
  • Checked consistency with documentation standards
  • Reviewed accessibility improvements

Related Documentation

  • Follows structure outlined in Adding a Component Documentation Standards
  • Maintains consistency with accordion, button, meter, progress bar, progress circle, and tooltip README files
  • Implements accessibility best practices as demonstrated in other component documentation

This reorganization makes the color-area documentation more accessible, easier to navigate, and consistent with the established documentation standards across the Spectrum Web Components library.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jul 11, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 98832a8

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 11, 2025

📚 Branch Preview

🔍 Visual Regression Test Results

When a visual regression test fails (or has previously failed while working on this branch), its results can be found in the following URLs:

Deployed to Azure Blob Storage: pr-5600

If the changes are expected, update the current_golden_images_cache hash in the circleci config to accept the new images. Instructions are included in that file.
If the changes are unexpected, you can investigate the cause of the differences and update the code accordingly.

Copy link

Tachometer results

Currently, no packages are changed by this PR...

@blunteshwar blunteshwar marked this pull request as ready for review July 14, 2025 09:12
@blunteshwar blunteshwar requested a review from a team as a code owner July 14, 2025 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant