Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade jest from 24.9.0 to 27.0.0 #584

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

adamlaska
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • packages/app/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 631/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.2
Missing Release of Resource after Effective Lifetime
SNYK-JS-INFLIGHT-6095116
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 646/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5
Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-REQUEST-3361831
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 646/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 6.5
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-TOUGHCOOKIE-5672873
Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 589/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-UNSETVALUE-2400660
Yes No Known Exploit

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: jest The new version differs by 250 commits.
  • be16e47 v27.0.0
  • 63102ec chore: update changelog for release
  • 564694a docs(blog): Jest 27 blog post (#11131)
  • b68d91b feat(pretty-print): add option `printBasicPrototype` (#11441)
  • 2226742 chore: minor simplify format results error (#11432)
  • 78eb25d chore: remove needless assign (#11433)
  • 696c455 chore: update lockfile after publish
  • e2eb9ae v27.0.0-next.11
  • 3b253f8 Wait for closed resources to actually close before detecting open handles (#11429)
  • 27bee72 fix: run GC before collecting open handles (#11278)
  • 50451df feat: use fallback if prettier not found (#11400)
  • 150dbd8 chore: update lockfile after publish
  • 6f44529 v27.0.0-next.10
  • cbcec7d Upgrade fsevents in jest-haste-map (#11428)
  • 9633a26 feat: support reporters written in ESM (#11427)
  • 59f42d8 fix: do not cache modules that throw during evaluation (#11263)
  • 57e32e9 Detect open handles with done callbacks (#11382)
  • a397607 Document and test dontThrow for custom inline snapshot matchers (#10995)
  • 4fa3a0b feat: custom haste (#11107)
  • 2047a36 chore: bump deps (#11419)
  • a4358d6 chore: run prettier on changelog
  • bdd6282 Move all default values into `jest-config` (#9924)
  • db643a1 Link to Jest config (#11106)
  • b16082c Fix locale issue #10014 (#11412)

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Server-side Request Forgery (SSRF)
🦉 Prototype Pollution

Copy link

google-cla bot commented Dec 30, 2023

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants