Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Priority: Allow gateway fields to be available on capture endpoint #5010

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2024

Conversation

yunnydang
Copy link
Contributor

This change is to essentially allow the gateway fields to be available on the capture endpoint. Written the remote and unit tests to confirm this. I would note that the failing remote tests return the error message of rapid refund detected, so I'm assuming the sandbox has some rate limit attached.

Local:
5800 tests, 78860 assertions, 0 failures, 26 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications 99.5517% passed

Unit:
21 tests, 145 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications 100% passed

Remote:
31 tests, 84 assertions, 5 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications 83.871% passed

@yunnydang yunnydang requested a review from a team January 18, 2024 23:20
@yunnydang yunnydang self-assigned this Jan 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@rachelkirk rachelkirk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good and tests pass. I noticed similar behavior with a possible limit on refund transactions. Seems odd, but since your changes are unrelated to refund I think it's fine to proceed. I left one note about a commented out section, so with the understanding that will be removed, :shipit:

test/unit/gateways/priority_test.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@yunnydang yunnydang force-pushed the CER-1167_priority_add_gsf_to_capture branch from 2e0d2fc to 4e0b5e3 Compare January 20, 2024 00:35
Local:
5800 tests, 78860 assertions, 0 failures, 26 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications
99.5517% passed

Unit:
21 tests, 145 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications
100% passed

Remote:
31 tests, 84 assertions, 5 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications
83.871% passed
@yunnydang yunnydang force-pushed the CER-1167_priority_add_gsf_to_capture branch from 4e0b5e3 to 853b91e Compare January 22, 2024 20:26
@yunnydang yunnydang merged commit 853b91e into master Jan 22, 2024
0 of 5 checks passed
@yunnydang yunnydang deleted the CER-1167_priority_add_gsf_to_capture branch January 22, 2024 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants