Skip to content

Conversation

@nicholaspai
Copy link
Member

Simple script that errors if developer makes changes that would change the storage layout but hasn't committed new storage layout file

Simple script that errors if developer makes changes that would change the storage layout but hasn't committed new storage layout file
@nicholaspai nicholaspai changed the title WIP: feat: Add storage layout check script to ci feat: Add storage layout check script to ci Mar 18, 2024
@nicholaspai nicholaspai marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2024 17:20
@nicholaspai nicholaspai force-pushed the npai/check-storage-layout branch from a168e0f to 54b2ddd Compare March 18, 2024 18:25
Copy link
Contributor

@james-a-morris james-a-morris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can put up a test PR that changes the diff to test that this fails. Otherwise LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@mrice32 mrice32 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Just minor nits and questions about comments

Comment on lines +45 to +47
strategy:
matrix:
node: [16]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a need to use matrix? Looks like it is only one param to use (not sure if you guys are planning to run with other nodes too). By the way node 16 is no longer maintained and considered deprecated https://nodejs.org/en/blog/announcements/nodejs16-eol

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah we need to move off of this but our stack currently can't automatically upgrade. @james-a-morris is working on this

@nicholaspai nicholaspai merged commit 7db71d0 into master Mar 26, 2024
@nicholaspai nicholaspai deleted the npai/check-storage-layout branch March 26, 2024 23:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants