Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 3, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

sameetandpotatoes
Copy link
Member

@sameetandpotatoes sameetandpotatoes commented May 15, 2017

This PR (or set of PRs, see below) standardizes a bunch of things for the Ruby services with docker and in general (Ben has done this for all Python services). Specifically:

  • Removes suffix of _dev names
  • Removes deprecated RecruiterToken
  • Standardizes database names

Other PRs with this:

To make sure this is done correctly in prod, I think we need to rename the databases in the docker db container as well, as well as update all the config files.

@sameetandpotatoes
Copy link
Member Author

sameetandpotatoes commented May 15, 2017

I will wait until after @bcongdon merges groot-auth-stub-service probably to merge all these changes, just because there is a decent amount of overhead with changing config files.

@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS groot_caffeine_service_dev;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does caffeine service not need a database anymore?

Copy link
Member Author

@sameetandpotatoes sameetandpotatoes May 16, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Caffeine was always groot-merch-service (the database name specified was probably named this at one point before we made the change to rename caffeine to merch). We made the database change name everywhere so I'm pretty sure this is not needed anymore.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, forgot about that lol

@sameetandpotatoes
Copy link
Member Author

Ready for a look from @bcongdon and @narendasan.

@narendasan
Copy link
Member

Most of these changes and the changes in the PRs listed look fine, will wait on @bcongdon to take a look as well. Made a comment on one of the repos but its just a usability thing

@bcongdon
Copy link
Member

So are the test databases just used for unit testing (i.e. not development)? If so, then this is probably good-to-go.

@sameetandpotatoes
Copy link
Member Author

sameetandpotatoes commented May 17, 2017 via email

Copy link
Member

@bcongdon bcongdon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good then

@sameetandpotatoes sameetandpotatoes merged commit 9eaaf4d into master May 18, 2017
@sameetandpotatoes sameetandpotatoes deleted the rename_yaml_keys branch May 18, 2017 14:49
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants