Skip to content

Conversation

@ziadhany
Copy link
Collaborator

@ziadhany ziadhany commented Feb 18, 2024

image
Issue #1028

@TG1999
Copy link
Contributor

TG1999 commented Feb 26, 2024

I think we need a new tab for this, @DennisClark what's your initial thoughts on this ?

@ziadhany ziadhany force-pushed the exploit-vul branch 2 times, most recently from 5d90bdc to 0a2d084 Compare March 5, 2024 13:50

@property
def interesting_advisories(self) -> QuerySet:
return [Advisory.objects.all()[0]]
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not sure if this is the right way to just run the improver

@ziadhany ziadhany marked this pull request as ready for review March 12, 2024 14:57
@TG1999 TG1999 requested a review from keshav-space July 9, 2024 15:39
Copy link
Member

@keshav-space keshav-space left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ziadhany Thanks ++
Looking good! see minor nits for your consideration.
Also, please add some tests.

Add a Kev test & function docstrings
Change the kev model ( known_ransomware_campaign_use from integer choices to boolean )
Add kev to api
Access the vulnerability directly from Alias
Add a tooltips and edit kev table
Add a kev in a separate tab
Solve migration conflict
Add a basic improver
squash migration files
Add a basic Known Exploited Vulnerabilities model

Signed-off-by: ziadhany <ziadhany2016@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@keshav-space keshav-space left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ziadhany, Merging!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants