-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 595
added support to parse labels in dockerfile #3987
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
edd1a8d
to
c90069a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@VarshaUN Thanks++
Looking good, need another round of changes and a lot more tests here for the added functionality, and this should be much better.
d60d0c8
to
328639b
Compare
e82bc6c
to
7a785ea
Compare
@AyanSinhaMahapatra I have added everything that you told me. Please review it. |
a7ba60e
to
adf690a
Compare
Signed-off-by: Ayan Sinha Mahapatra <ayansmahapatra@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jono Yang <jyang@nexb.com> Signed-off-by: Jono Yang <jyang@nexb.com> addded support to parse labels in dockerfile Signed-off-by: Varsha U N <varshamaddur2006@gmail.com>
adf690a
to
610689c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks++ @VarshaUN this is looking great! A few more comments for your consideration. Thank you for your patience
Can you also remove this file which was added with your PR: tests/packagedcode/__pycache__/test_parse_pyproject_toml.cpython-312-pytest-8.3.3.pyc.26520
?
Please also make sure you look into test failures (many are failing as an effect of this PR) and try to resolve them if they are related to your PR, also merge from develop since it's been a while.
from packagedcode.dockerfile import DockerfileHandler | ||
|
||
class TestDockerfileHandler: | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you also run one full scan for one case, like the test here: https://github.com/aboutcode-org/scancode-toolkit/blob/develop/tests/packagedcode/test_cargo.py#L158, one is enough, don't have to do this for all files
expected_packages = self.load_expected(expected_loc) | ||
assert packages == expected_packages | ||
|
||
def test_extract_oci_labels_from_dockerfile(self, mocker): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is an issue here, how is the files generated by this test different from the test functions test_parse_dockerfile
above? You are using the same filenames for the test expectations so we are missing a set of test files.
We want to have two sets of tests distinctly both for DockerfileHandler.parse
and DockerfileHandler.extract_oci_labels_from_dockerfile
and this should generate 2 sets of files so 2 docker/container files and total 6 test expectation files. You might want to use -package.expected.json
and -expected.json
to differentiate there.
Signed-off-by: Varsha U N <varshaun58@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@VarshaUN thanks for the updates, please fix all test failures. Looks good and ready to merge otherwise.
tests/packagedcode/data/docker/test-dockerfile/test.dockerfile-package.expected.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Varsha U N <varshaun58@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Varsha U N <varshaun58@gmail.com>
Fixes #3561
Tasks
Signed-off-by: Varsha U N varshaun58@gmail.com