general updates for kernel version compatiblity #239
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Fixes: 40fefb2 ("compat: Fix __has_attribute usage") Signed-off-by: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
and do not query unrelated modules Signed-off-by: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
the recursive calls slowed down the configure script significantly Signed-off-by: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
skb_reset_mac_len() was introduced in v3.0-rc3 and is used unconditionally Signed-off-by: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
netif_is_bridge_port() was introduced in v4.4-rc2 by "vlan: Do not put vlan headers back on bridge and macvlan ports" (28f9ee22bcdd84726dbf6267d0b58f254166b900) Signed-off-by: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
adapt to "move asm/unaligned.h to linux/unaligned.h" (5f60d5f6bbc12e782fac78110b0ee62698f3b576) in v6.12-rc2 Fixes: aabc#237 Signed-off-by: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
strscpy has been around since 4.3, and strlcpy got removed in 6.8. This patch switches to the plainly preferred strscpy whenever it is available, but will define that to strlcpy if strscpy (sized_strscpy due to strscpy really being a macro) is not available. Ideally we want to compile a test-call, but kbuild_test_symbol() doesn't work that way. We could also simply go "#ifndef strscpy ... # define strscpy strlcpy" if that would be preferred. Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
I've verified and traced this back to the initial import into git, around version 2.6.12 of the kernel. If anybody fails to compile against older than that I think we can look into this but highly doubt that'll be an issue. Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
For backwards compatiblity this gets pretty nasty. This should work fairly well. Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za>
|
Updated PR with non-default ./configure options too. primarily for the u32 random stuff, much of the history is difficult to track to specific version numbers, so linux/random.h is included always, and prandom.h only if available and needed. |
jkroonza
added a commit
to jkroonza/gentoo
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2025
Snapshot version of aabc/ipt-netflow#239 Naming is such that if an official 2.6.x gets released, this will supercede that, but 2.7 will be "newer". This isn't quite live, and I don't like this, one bit, but it's a workable solution. Extra .0 so that we can bump these "semi live" versions at a later stage. I also updated the -gentoo.patch to sort out LDFLAGS not respected QA error. Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/950506 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/831306
4 tasks
|
Tested with more combinations of /configure now, that matters for Gentoo, and I'm 99% sure of these commits. Would appreciate review on this, and pointers please if there is anything anyone is unhappy with. |
jkroonza
added a commit
to jkroonza/gentoo
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2025
Snapshot version of aabc/ipt-netflow#239 I also updated the -gentoo.patch to sort out LDFLAGS not respected QA error. Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/950506 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/831306
jkroonza
added a commit
to jkroonza/gentoo
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2025
Snapshot version of aabc/ipt-netflow#239 Updated the -gentoo.patch to sort out LDFLAGS not respected QA error. Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/950506 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/831306
Added to Arch ✔️ |
gentoo-bot
pushed a commit
to gentoo/gentoo
that referenced
this pull request
May 21, 2025
Snapshot version of aabc/ipt-netflow#239 Updated the -gentoo.patch to sort out LDFLAGS not respected QA error. Signed-off-by: Jaco Kroon <jaco@uls.co.za> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/950506 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/831306 Part-of: #41138 Closes: #41138 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This builds on top of #233.
After pushing this and looking at the comment logs of some other PRs, I think #230, #221, #217 and #216 might also be covered by this. This was tested against kernel 6.12.1.
There is one question in my mind still:
The definition here is also slightly different, and arguably better, cleaner.
Otherwise I believe this covers everything required.