Closed
Description
Motivation
We'd like to standardize the way the workflows are named, and align their names with what's actually being executed inside the workflow.
Specifications
When we do the redesign of Zebra CI, can we use a naming standard for workflow files?
For example, we could name them something like: (purpose)-(when they run)-(where they run)-(what they do)-(patch?).yml
So we'd end up with names like:
sub-build-docker-image.yml
ci-pr-gcp-continuous-integration-test-docker.yml
ci-pr-gh-continuous-integration-test-os.yml
cd-release-gcp-continuous-delivery-deploy-docker.yml
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Type
Projects
Status
Done