Skip to content

actions: use a name convention for workflow files/names #6166

Closed

Description

Motivation

We'd like to standardize the way the workflows are named, and align their names with what's actually being executed inside the workflow.

Specifications

When we do the redesign of Zebra CI, can we use a naming standard for workflow files?
For example, we could name them something like: (purpose)-(when they run)-(where they run)-(what they do)-(patch?).yml

So we'd end up with names like:

  • sub-build-docker-image.yml
  • ci-pr-gcp-continuous-integration-test-docker.yml
  • ci-pr-gh-continuous-integration-test-os.yml
  • cd-release-gcp-continuous-delivery-deploy-docker.yml
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Labels

A-devopsArea: Pipelines, CI/CD and DockerfilesC-enhancementCategory: This is an improvementI-usabilityZebra is hard to understand or useS-needs-triageStatus: A bug report needs triage

Type

No type

Projects

  • Status

    Done

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions