functional, glift: use fold overload of IdString::in instead of pool … #4709
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…literals
We have the following methods:
The
celltype.in(ID($add), ...)
pattern uses the former whilecelltype.in({ID($add), ...})
forces the latter since the argument is anstd::initializer_list<pool<IdString>>
. The former probably has lower runtime overhead since instead of hashing and resizing a hash table it just finds thecelltype
in a compile-time known list of IDs, so we can switch to it whenever manually listing like a dozen IDs to check against.