Skip to content

Conversation

@jrfnl
Copy link
Collaborator

@jrfnl jrfnl commented Jan 8, 2025

... as Remark seems to be struggling with it and we don't have influence on the potentially broken HTML created by GH anyway, so we can't fix the anchor on the page. The link works, so it really is a non-issue and the failing CI builds are getting annoying.

@jrfnl jrfnl added this to the 2.0.3 milestone Jan 8, 2025
@jrfnl jrfnl changed the base branch from 3.x to 2.x January 8, 2025 17:13
... as Remark seems to be struggling with it and we don't have influence on the potentially broken HTML created by GH anyway, so we can't fix the anchor on the page.
The link works, so it really is a non-issue and the failing CI builds are getting annoying.
@jrfnl jrfnl force-pushed the feature/remark-link-check-tweak branch from feb555c to 4c286b9 Compare January 8, 2025 17:13
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 8, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 95.846%. remained the same
when pulling 4c286b9 on feature/remark-link-check-tweak
into da4169e on 2.x.

@jrfnl jrfnl merged commit 22e4b7b into 2.x Jan 8, 2025
165 checks passed
@jrfnl jrfnl deleted the feature/remark-link-check-tweak branch January 8, 2025 17:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants