Theme: Add dimension tokens for control height #75101
Draft
+118
−24
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Warning: Type of PR label mismatch To merge this PR, it requires exactly 1 label indicating the type of PR. Other labels are optional and not being checked here.
Read more about Type labels in Gutenberg. Don't worry if you don't have the required permissions to add labels; the PR reviewer should be able to help with the task. |
|
Size Change: +1.09 kB (+0.04%) Total Size: 3 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
aduth
added
the
[Type] Task
Member
Author
|
Curious the overlap between something like this and #73429 , where we may want consistency of "dropdown item" heights like menus, select dropdown options, etc. |
Contributor
|
Height arguably has application beyond controls; menu items, toolbars, chips, images (avatars), tabs. So I wonder if this should be a broader more generic scale? I'm also curious how checkboxes and radios fit in. They're controls, but not covered by proposed the scale currently. Should they be? This may also hint towards a larger scale. The density picture still isn't super clear to me which makes it difficult to comment on the interaction between |
Member
Author
I think one of the takeaways for me here was in how we want to guarantee vertical alignment between adjacent controls. Does that extend to checkboxes and radios as well? (And is that the same as every other control, i.e. fitting within the existing set)
Yeah one thing which occurs to me now after letting it sit for the weekend is that while there's precedent with the "small" and "compact" naming variants here, it doesn't do us any favors in how it overlaps with the "compact" density. Especially confusing is the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What?
Builds on: #75054
Related discussion: #74652 (comment)
Adds new
control-heightdimension tokens and updatesButtonto use them.Why?
Right now, this is exploratory, seeking to:
control-height.Input, and perhaps later expanded to incorporate other common control aspects like inline padding, gaps, and icon size.This doesn't completely answer the question about the relation between component-specific sizing properties like
Button'ssize=compactorTab'sdensity/variant, but it does provide a path for them to work together:sizeallow absolute control over the role that component plays (e.g. toggle buttons are inherently compact)Testing Instructions
Review Button stories, particularly the "Compact" and "Default" buttons in combination with "Compact" or "Comfortable" theme density.