feat: hardcode pkg version number

[cpaniaguam]

This approach is working well with IFTPipeline!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.06% 🎉

Comparison is base (65994ce) 91.78% compared to head (1640a21) 91.84%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head 1640a21 differs from pull request most recent head 748628e. Consider uploading reports for the commit 748628e to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #332      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.78%   91.84%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          29       29              
  Lines         876      871       -5     
==========================================
- Hits          804      800       -4     
+ Misses         72       71       -1     

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
src/IceFloeTracker.jl	100.00% <ø> (+6.66%)	⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[tdivoll]

I was testing with Pkg.project().version instead of VersionNumber(0,2,0). It seems to return the version fine and updating the test worked as well. However, it tries to activate a Julia REPL and IFT when I try to commit the changes.

[cpaniaguam]

I was testing with Pkg.project().version instead of VersionNumber(0,2,0). It seems to return the version fine and updating the test worked as well. However, it tries to activate a Julia REPL and IFT when I try to commit the changes.

I'll test this within IFTPipeline. Thanks!

[cpaniaguam]

I was testing with Pkg.project().version instead of VersionNumber(0,2,0). It seems to return the version fine and updating the test worked as well. However, it tries to activate a Julia REPL and IFT when I try to commit the changes.

I'll test this within IFTPipeline. Thanks!

When used within IFTPipeline it returns IFTPipeline's version :/. Going back to testing with hard-coding the version number.

[cpaniaguam]

@tdivoll I think hard coding the version number is probably the way to go.

[cpaniaguam]

@tdivoll I think hard coding the version number is probably the way to go.

@tdivoll Things working well within the container.

[tdivoll]

Sounds good to me, it is a minor task to update when we update version numbers.