Skip to content

Use new Web IDL buffer primitives #2358

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

domenic
Copy link
Contributor

@domenic domenic commented Jun 25, 2021

See whatwg/webidl#987. In particular, "get a reference to the bytes" is going away, replaced with "write".

@rtoy
Copy link
Member

rtoy commented Jun 25, 2021

In addition to the failures shown by Travis CI, we can't land this as is since the spec if a Living Standard. I think these changes need to be marked up as shown in https://fantasai.inkedblade.net/style/design/w3c-restyle/2020/readme#amendment.

I'd be more than happy to do this for you, if you like. We need some experience in doing these things, and this change seems another relatively simple update. (Well except for the bikeshed failures; I'll have to look into that a bit.)

@domenic
Copy link
Contributor Author

domenic commented Jun 25, 2021

Yes, I'd appreciate if someone else could take this over. It's a real shame that we're still producing dead standards though :(. I hope the editor's draft at least can be kept up to date so that implementers have a source of truth to look at.

The Bikeshed failures are likely due to Web IDL not yet deploying its new version, due to Travis CI issues. They should go away when we get that figured out.

(Note that once that is figured out, all dead versions of the Web Audio standard will have broken links... I guess that's pretty typical for dead standards though.)

@rtoy
Copy link
Member

rtoy commented Jun 25, 2021

Sure, I can take over PR.

I believe the editors draft will have all of the annotations for the changes, so it should be up-to-date with all the changes. @svgeesus will have to help us to figure out how to move the editor's draft to recommendation at some later date. Not sure if that's been figured out yet.

@padenot
Copy link
Member

padenot commented Aug 12, 2021

We can close this, this has been handled in #2363.

@hoch hoch closed this Aug 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants