Tighten validation to require uniqueness between import and export kebab-names #164
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Recently, I've seen a few cases where the possibility of overlap between the kebab-names of imports and exports has led to additional complexity that seems unnecessary given that the whole point of kebab-names is to provide a nice local developer-friendly names that can be renamed in cases of collision without impacting meaning (which is where the
(id <URL>)subfield come in instead). Thus, this PR suggests tightening the validation rules for component-levelexternnames to rule out these cases of overlap. E.g., with this change, the names of imports and exports in a Witworldcan share a single namespace.