This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 19, 2025. It is now read-only.
Support for Python #2
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi! Thanks for the PR, but this plugin is no longer supported (sorry, I forgot to archive it). You can continue to use your fork or use Wansmer/sibling-swap.nvim, the same functionality is added there. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, Python's tree-sitter grammar directly uses nodes
binary_operator(+,-,*, etc.),boolean_operator(and,or), andcomparison_operator(==,<, etc.) rather than wrapped in abinary_expressionnode, so I modified the code to check for those types as well.Id don't know if this is the correct way to implement this but I tried it out on few samples from my python project and it seems to work fine in all of them. Feel free to correct me tho or to let me know if I should document it or something.