I am an AI systems engineer and open-source founder in Agra, India, with a CSE (AI/ML) background from VIT. I work across the full stack: Rust kernels and no_std userland, Python agent runtimes, TypeScript interfaces, model evaluation, CI, releases, and product design.
My recurring question is:
How do we give an agent useful autonomy without confusing intelligence with authority?
That is why my projects publish capability boundaries, reproducible evidence, failure history, and limitations alongside the features.
| Project | What exists today | Start with the evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Heliox OS | Local-first governed desktop agent for typed, voice, gesture, gaze, browser, application, IDE, and system interaction. Its 21-specialist mesh registers providers for 157 declared actions. | v0.12.0 · Website · Proof · Capabilities |
| FerrumOS | Bootable x86_64 Rust research OS with Ring-3 userland, capability-gated syscalls, a JEPA-assisted safety screen, and a simulator-backed cyber-physical software tier. | Website · Proof · Research paper |
| Nucle-OS | Software-defined DNA storage engine plus NucleScript, a compiler-checked DSL for molecular-storage workflows. The current workspace documents 729 discovered tests. | README and benchmarks · Live playground |
Heliox is an MIT-licensed desktop agent for Windows, macOS, and Linux. It converts natural-language and opt-in multimodal input into validated plans, asks before risky work, and routes actions through permission and verification contracts.
- 157 declared action types backed by 21 executable specialists.
- Text, continuous voice, gesture, gaze-region signals, screen context, and experimental neural input share a priority-controlled interaction path.
- Local and cloud model providers plus text-only planning through officially authenticated Codex and Claude Code CLIs; provider credentials remain with the provider tools.
- Local IDE MCP, secure Air Handoff, calendar/email/allowlisted-SSH integrations, plugin manifests, a repository-governed marketplace, approval gates, rollback planning, and outcome verification.
- Public capability catalog, benchmark artifacts, release feeds, failure notes, and agent-readable documentation.
- The measured guarded CPU-status fast path is 27.229 ms median / 29.476 ms p95 across 100 non-LLM iterations; it is not presented as end-to-end voice, browser, provider, or UI latency.
Current limitation: provider coverage is not the same as independently observed success. Eleven of the 157 actions currently have an independent post-condition verifier; hardware accuracy for microphones, cameras, gaze, gestures, and EEG requires human testing.
FerrumOS studies what changes when an agent acts through an operating-system security boundary rather than only through application-level tools.
- Bootable Rust kernel, ELF loading, real Ring-3 processes, scheduler, filesystem, GUI, and package/runtime services.
- 61-syscall ABI, 41 canonical agent operations, and five permission tiers.
- Every public tool path passes through deterministic policy and a provider-independent predictive screen before execution.
- Public QEMU evidence covers 101/101 focused command paths and 81/81 catalog entries for the recorded audit commit.
- The simulator-backed cyber-physical software tier passes 152/152 deterministic contracts and 32/32 physical-model, robustness, and neural-decoder gates.
- Ring-3 world-model preview measurements span 1.29–1.57 ms run means across H=1…5 with zero measured heap growth in three runs.
- Synthetic neural intent is bounded and fail-closed; physical predictions remain shadow-only and cannot grant actuator authority.
The published fixture reports 81.4% balanced accuracy for rules + JEPA vs 81.2% for rules + a per-action mean baseline. That is deliberately documented as no material JEPA advantage on that fixture—not hidden behind the headline.
FerrumOS is a QEMU/Bochs research OS. The cyber-physical results are software and simulator evidence—not proof of installed third-party simulators or transports, robot execution, broad physical-PC compatibility, hard-real-time behavior, formal safety certification, or validated live EEG control.
Nucle-OS treats molecular storage as a software system with explicit codecs, recovery, indexing, policy, observability, and hardware-provider boundaries.
- Eight-layer engine: synthesis simulation, encoding, ECC, retrieval/indexing, VFS, agent interface, hardware bridge, and block-device abstraction.
- Yin–Yang, ternary, fountain, and direct-packing codecs with biological constraint checks.
- Reed–Solomon error-and-erasure recovery, fountain erasure repair, and partial-order-alignment consensus.
- Durable VFS with versioning, migration, capacity limits, encryption, integrity scanning, tenancy, audit logs, and Prometheus metrics.
- NucleScript compiler, type/effect system, LSP, VS Code extension, package registry, CLI, native playground, and browser WASM playground.
- 729 discovered tests: 728 passed and one ignored in the documented workspace run.
The project simulates and integrates DNA-storage workflows in software; it does not claim that every workflow has been run against a production wet lab.
| Artifact | What it establishes | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| FerrumOS world-model report | Reproducible comparison of deterministic rules, JEPA, and baseline prediction at an OS action boundary | Authored fixture; not an independent replication or safety certificate |
| FerrumOS public dataset | Versioned evidence used by the published evaluation | Dataset scope does not establish physical deployment accuracy |
| Heliox proof center | Capability coverage, software benchmarks, known limitations, and failure history | Software CI does not replace physical microphone/camera/EEG testing |
| Nucle-OS benchmark documentation | Codec, noise, ECC, recovery, and full-pipeline software evidence | Simulation and vendor adapters are not wet-lab validation |
I am interested in collaborations around agentic operating systems, capability security, assistive multimodal interfaces, world models, compilers, and molecular storage.
- Start with Heliox issues if you want to improve a user-facing agent.
- Start with FerrumOS research and architecture if you work on OS or model safety boundaries.
- Try NucleScript in the browser if compilers or DNA storage are your direction.
- Sponsor physical validation, clean-machine testing, and open hardware research through GitHub Sponsors.



