Recent changes #25
Recent changes #25
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request involves systematic documentation updates across multiple device protocol configuration files. A new section titled "Protocol Content" has been added to various device documentation files in the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (19)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (17)
🔇 Additional comments (5)docs/admin/devices/estreamer.mdx (2)
The parameters table needs descriptions for all fields to properly document:
Example improvements: |Field|Subfield|Required|Default|Description|
|---|---|---|---|---|
-|`id`|-|Y|||
+|`id`|-|Y|-|Unique identifier for the eStreamer device configuration|
-|`status`|-||`false`||
+|`status`|-|Y|`false`|Enable/disable the eStreamer device (true/false)|
The Examples section needs sample configurations demonstrating:
Example: devices:
- id: 1
name: "estreamer-collector"
type: estreamer
status: true
properties:
address: "0.0.0.0"
port: 8302
tls:
non_secure: false
cert_name: "estreamer.crt"
key_name: "estreamer.key"docs/admin/devices/syslog.mdx (3)
The parameters table needs descriptions for all fields to explain:
Example: |Field|Subfield|Required|Default|Description|
|---|---|---|---|---|
-|`properties`|`network`|Y|`"udp"`||
+|`properties`|`network`|Y|`"udp"`|Network protocol (valid values: "udp", "tcp")|
-||`port`|Y|`14514`||
+||`port`|Y|`14514`|Port number to listen for syslog messages|
There are two identical sections for UDP configuration examples. The second one is empty and appears to be redundant. Remove the duplicate section: -<details>
-<summary>Listen to syslog over a regular **UDP** connection</summary>
-```yaml
-```
-</details>
The TCP configuration examples are empty. Please provide sample configurations for:
Example for TCP with line parser: devices:
- id: 1
name: "syslog-tcp"
type: syslog
properties:
network: "tcp"
address: "0.0.0.0"
port: 514
tls: falseThank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🔭 Outside diff range comments (4)
docs/admin/devices/kafka.mdx (1)
Line range hint
24-39: Add missing parameter descriptions in the tableThe parameter table is missing descriptions for most fields. Consider adding clear descriptions for each parameter to help users understand their purpose and usage.
For example:
id: Unique identifier for the Kafka devicename: IP address or hostname for the devicestatus: Enables or disables the deviceproperties.address: Kafka broker address- etc.
docs/admin/devices/tcp.mdx (1)
Line range hint
23-23: Add content to the Description sectionThe Description section is empty. Consider adding a brief overview of the TCP protocol and its use cases in the context of this application.
docs/admin/devices/http.mdx (1)
Line range hint
35-43: Complete the parameter descriptionsSeveral parameter descriptions are incomplete or unclear:
flush_interval: "The time interval (sec) used to flush the... whatever"queue.interval: "The time interval (sec) used to... whatever"Please provide complete and clear descriptions for these parameters.
docs/admin/devices/netflow.mdx (1)
Line range hint
52-108: Uncomment and complete Protocol Content sectionThe Protocol Content section contains valuable information about NetFlow data fields but is currently commented out. Consider:
- Uncommenting this section
- Reviewing the content for accuracy
- Completing any missing information
- Organizing it consistently with other protocol documentation
🧹 Nitpick comments (23)
docs/admin/devices/udp.mdx (2)
28-29: Consider reordering documentation sections for better flow.The "Protocol Content" section would be more logical if placed after the "Description" section and before "Parameters", as it likely contains protocol-specific details that readers should understand before diving into parameter configurations.
# UDP ## Synopsis ## Description +## Protocol Content + +{/* TODO: Complete */} + ## Parameters ... -## Protocol Content - -{/* TODO: Complete */}
29-29: Track the TODO comment in the issue tracker.The TODO placeholder indicates incomplete documentation. This should be tracked to ensure it gets completed.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the completion of the Protocol Content section? I can help create an issue template that covers the expected content structure for consistency across all protocol documentation files.
docs/admin/devices/windows.mdx (1)
28-29: Consider automating documentation structure updates.Given that this same change pattern appears across multiple protocol documentation files, consider:
- Using a documentation template to ensure consistent section ordering
- Creating a script to validate documentation structure
- Implementing a systematic way to track and complete all TODO items
Would you like me to:
- Create a documentation template that standardizes the section order?
- Generate a script that validates the documentation structure across all protocol files?
- Create a tracking issue for completing all Protocol Content sections?
docs/admin/devices/sflow.mdx (1)
48-49: Consider reordering sections for better documentation flow.The "Protocol Content" section would be more logically placed after the "Description" section and before "Parameters", as it likely contains protocol-specific details that readers should understand before diving into parameter descriptions.
Would you like me to help create a GitHub issue to track the completion of this section and suggest a standard template for protocol content?
docs/admin/devices/redis.mdx (1)
52-53: Maintain consistent section ordering across protocol documentation.For consistency with other protocol documentation and improved readability, consider standardizing the section order across all device documentation files:
- Synopsis
- Description
- Protocol Content
- Parameters
- Examples
docs/admin/devices/smtp.mdx (2)
54-55: Consider creating a documentation template for protocol content.Since this is part of a broader documentation standardization effort across multiple protocol files, consider:
- Creating a standard template for the "Protocol Content" section
- Including key subsections like:
- Protocol Overview
- Message Format
- Authentication Methods
- Common Use Cases
- Known Limitations
Would you like me to help create:
- A standard template for the "Protocol Content" section?
- A GitHub issue to track the completion of all protocol documentation?
Line range hint
48-55: Recommendation for systematic documentation updates.The addition of "Protocol Content" sections across multiple device documentation files indicates a good initiative towards standardization. To make this more effective:
- Consider creating a pull request template for documentation changes
- Establish a clear timeline for completing the TODO sections
- Create a standard structure that all protocol documentation should follow
- Consider adding a documentation linter to enforce the structure
This will help maintain consistency and completeness across all protocol documentation.
docs/admin/devices/snmp-trap.mdx (2)
59-60: Track TODO completion for Protocol Content sectionThe new Protocol Content section is currently incomplete. Since this appears to be part of a broader documentation standardization effort, we should ensure this section is completed with relevant SNMP Trap protocol-specific information.
Would you like me to:
- Create a GitHub issue to track this TODO?
- Provide a template for the Protocol Content section based on SNMP Trap specifications?
Line range hint
53-57: Consider adding example configurationsThe Examples section is currently empty. Consider adding practical SNMP Trap configuration examples to help users understand the implementation.
Would you like me to provide some common SNMP Trap configuration examples?
docs/admin/devices/nats.mdx (2)
60-61: Track TODO completion for Protocol Content sectionThe new Protocol Content section needs to be completed. Since NATS has specific protocol details around pub/sub patterns and JetStream, this section could provide valuable implementation details.
Would you like me to:
- Create a GitHub issue to track this TODO?
- Draft protocol-specific content covering NATS core concepts and JetStream features?
Line range hint
53-57: Consider adding example configurationsThe Examples section would benefit from practical NATS configuration examples, especially showing different authentication methods and TLS setup.
Would you like me to provide example configurations covering common NATS usage patterns?
docs/admin/devices/rabbitmq.mdx (4)
32-32: Enhance protocol descriptionWhile the current description is accurate, consider expanding it to highlight RabbitMQ's key features like message queuing, routing capabilities, and exchange types.
Would you like me to provide a more comprehensive description that covers these aspects?
64-65: Track TODO completion for Protocol Content sectionThe Protocol Content section needs completion. Given RabbitMQ's rich feature set, this section could cover important concepts like exchanges, queues, bindings, and routing strategies.
Would you like me to:
- Create a GitHub issue to track this TODO?
- Draft detailed protocol content covering RabbitMQ's core concepts and best practices?
Line range hint
58-62: Consider adding example configurationsThe Examples section would benefit from practical RabbitMQ configuration examples, especially demonstrating different exchange types and queue bindings.
Would you like me to provide example configurations covering common RabbitMQ patterns?
Line range hint
59-65: Consider documenting the standardized structureThe addition of Protocol Content sections across multiple device documentation files indicates a move toward standardization. Consider adding a template or contributing guidelines document that outlines this standard structure to help maintain consistency as new protocol documentation is added.
Would you like me to draft a documentation template that captures this standardized structure?
docs/admin/devices/kafka.mdx (2)
Line range hint
27-27: Fix formatting in parameter tableThere's a formatting issue in the
nameparameter row:-|`name`|`Y|`127.0.0.1`|| +|`name`|Y|`127.0.0.1`||
64-65: Consider structuring the Protocol Content sectionThe new section is appropriately placed but currently contains only a TODO comment. Consider structuring it to include:
- Protocol-specific details
- Connection handling
- Message format
- Security considerations
- Common configurations
- Troubleshooting tips
Would you like me to help outline the structure for the Protocol Content section?
docs/admin/devices/tcp.mdx (2)
Line range hint
27-43: Standardize parameter documentation formatThe parameter table uses nested HTML definition lists (
<dt>,<dd>), while other device documentation files use a simpler table format. Consider standardizing the format across all device documentation for consistency and better readability.
91-92: Structure the Protocol Content section for TCP-specific detailsThe new section should include TCP-specific information such as:
- Connection handling and lifecycle
- Socket options and configurations
- TLS/SSL implementation
- Performance tuning
- Error handling and recovery
- Common use cases
Would you like me to help outline the structure for the TCP Protocol Content section?
docs/admin/devices/http.mdx (3)
Line range hint
45-127: Remove commented-out alternative documentation formatThere's a large block of commented-out HTML-based parameter documentation. Since you've chosen the table format, consider removing this commented section to maintain cleaner documentation.
132-133: Structure the Protocol Content section for HTTP-specific detailsThe new section should include HTTP-specific information such as:
- Request/Response handling
- Supported HTTP methods
- Header management
- Authentication methods
- Rate limiting
- Error handling
- Common use cases and patterns
Would you like me to help outline the structure for the HTTP Protocol Content section?
Line range hint
64-65: Consider creating a documentation templateThe systematic addition of "Protocol Content" sections across multiple device documentation files is a good initiative. To ensure consistency, consider:
- Creating a template that defines the standard structure for all device documentation
- Including guidelines for what should be covered in each section
- Establishing a checklist for documentation completeness
This will help maintain consistency as you complete the TODO sections across all device documentation files.
Would you like me to help create a documentation template that can be used across all device protocol files?
Also applies to: 91-92, 132-133
docs/admin/devices/syslog.mdx (1)
Line range hint
1-144: Consider a phased documentation update approachThe documentation updates across all three files show a consistent pattern of restructuring, but the implementation is incomplete. Consider:
Implementing changes in phases:
- Phase 1: Complete parameter descriptions
- Phase 2: Add comprehensive examples
- Phase 3: Review and integrate Protocol Content sections
Creating a documentation template to ensure consistency across all device protocol files.
This will help maintain documentation quality while making the changes more manageable.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (19)
docs/admin/devices/azure-mon.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/estreamer.mdx(2 hunks)docs/admin/devices/http.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/ipfix.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/kafka.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/linux.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/ms-sentinel.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/nats.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/netflow.mdx(2 hunks)docs/admin/devices/rabbitmq.mdx(2 hunks)docs/admin/devices/redis.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/sflow.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/smtp.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/snmp-trap.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/syslog.mdx(2 hunks)docs/admin/devices/tcp.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/tftp.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/udp.mdx(1 hunks)docs/admin/devices/windows.mdx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
docs/admin/devices/linux.mdx (1)
28-29: Same structural feedback as UDP documentation applies.
The same section reordering suggestion and TODO tracking recommendation from the UDP documentation review applies here.
docs/admin/devices/ms-sentinel.mdx (1)
28-29: Track TODO completion across protocol documentation
The "Protocol Content" section is currently incomplete. This appears to be part of a larger documentation restructuring effort across multiple device protocol files.
Would you like me to:
- Create a GitHub issue to track the completion of all Protocol Content sections?
- Provide a template for the Protocol Content section based on other completed device documentation?
Let's check for any existing completed Protocol Content sections that could serve as a template:
docs/admin/devices/tftp.mdx (1)
43-44: Consider completing parameter descriptions while adding Protocol Content
While adding the new Protocol Content section, I notice that the parameter table above has empty description columns. Consider completing both the Protocol Content and parameter descriptions together for a more comprehensive documentation update.
Let's check if other device documentation files have complete parameter descriptions that could be referenced:
docs/admin/devices/azure-mon.mdx (2)
Line range hint 28-29: Coordinate documentation restructuring completion
The addition of "Protocol Content" sections across multiple protocol documentation files indicates a systematic documentation improvement effort. To ensure consistent and complete documentation:
-
Consider creating a documentation template that defines:
- Expected content for the Protocol Content section
- Standardized parameter table format
- Required sections and their order
-
Plan the phased completion of these sections to maintain consistency across all protocol documentation.
Let's verify the current documentation structure across all protocol files:
Also applies to: 43-44, 46-47
46-47: Consider standardizing parameter table format across protocol documentation
The Azure Monitor documentation uses a helpful subfield format in its parameter table. While adding the Protocol Content section, consider standardizing this improved table format across all protocol documentation for better clarity.
Let's check for consistency in parameter table formats across protocol documentation:
docs/admin/devices/ipfix.mdx (1)
103-103: LGTM!
The addition of the "Protocol Content" section header aligns with the documentation standardization effort.
mscandan
force-pushed
the
DT-74-Devices-Documentation
branch
from
f2db09d to
a04e613
Compare
|
Docs Feature Deployment https://58a90ea6.virtualmetric-docs.pages.dev |
Recent changes (to test the PR loop)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation