Skip to content

Conversation

@Praneethsai24
Copy link

@Praneethsai24 Praneethsai24 commented Nov 8, 2025

Fixed checksum logic, corrected brand detection rules, and removed redundant loops.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved Luhn checksum handling for more reliable card validation and clearer invalid exits.
    • Streamlined prefix/length checks to reduce false positives in card-type detection.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified input processing and consolidated validation into a single pass.
    • Cleaned up logic and naming for clearer, more maintainable card-type determination.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 8, 2025

Walkthrough

Rewrote credit.py to compute the Luhn checksum using a compact per-digit reversed loop, removed early prefix-validation and digit-splitting, simplified input/string handling, and consolidated card-type determination into a final concise check (AMEX/MASTERCARD/VISA/INVALID).

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Credit validation compact Luhn & type logic
Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py
Replaced multi-step/manual Luhn implementation with an in-place per-digit reversed loop; removed early prefix validation and separate digit-splitting logic; simplified input by converting number to string once; consolidated final card-type checks into a concise length-and-prefix decision (AMEX 15/34

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  participant User
  participant credit.py as Validator
  participant Output

  User->>Validator: provide card number (input -> str)
  Note right of Validator: Single pass checksum\n(reverse per-digit loop)
  Validator->>Validator: compute Luhn checksum (in-place)
  Validator-->>Validator: derive validated flag (checksum % 10 == 0)
  alt validated
    Validator->>Validator: determine card type by length & prefix
    Validator->>Output: print card type (AMEX/MASTERCARD/VISA)
  else invalid
    Validator->>Output: print "INVALID" and exit
  end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • Double-check Luhn implementation correctness (indexing/reversal and doubling positions).
  • Verify card-type prefix checks align exactly with required ranges (51–55) and lengths.
  • Confirm preserved early exit behavior and no regressions in input parsing or error handling.

Poem

🐰 I hopped through digits, quick and neat,
Reversed the steps and kept the beat,
A single pass, a checksum true,
AMEX, Visa, Master — chosen new,
Hooray — the cards align and meet! 🎉

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately reflects the main changes: it corrects the Luhn algorithm implementation and fixes brand validation logic in credit.py.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18b2788 and 2135608.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py (6)

1-2: LGTM! Clean imports.

The imports are appropriate: get_int for user input and sys for the early exit on invalid checksums.


4-6: LGTM! Efficient input handling.

Converting the number to a string once and reusing it throughout is a clean approach that avoids redundant conversions.


9-16: Excellent fix! Luhn algorithm is now correct.

The compact per-digit implementation correctly:

  • Reverses the card number and processes from right to left
  • Doubles every second digit starting from the second-to-last position
  • Uses the optimization d -= 9 instead of adding digit components (equivalent for two-digit results)
  • Accumulates the sum in a single pass

This resolves the critical issues from the previous implementation where alternate digits were incorrectly collected and lists were modified during iteration.


18-18: Perfect fix! Checksum validation is now correct.

The simple boolean assignment valid = (total % 10 == 0) correctly implements the Luhn checksum validation. This fixes the critical bug where the previous implementation set valid = True in both conditional branches, causing all cards to pass validation.


21-23: LGTM! Appropriate early exit.

Exiting immediately when the Luhn checksum fails is correct and efficient, avoiding unnecessary brand validation for invalid cards.


25-36: Excellent! Brand detection is now correct and concise.

The card type determination correctly implements the standard rules:

  • AMEX: 15 digits starting with 34 or 37
  • MASTERCARD: 16 digits starting with 51–55 (inclusive range check is correct)
  • VISA: 13 or 16 digits starting with 4
  • INVALID: Valid checksum but doesn't match any known brand

This fixes the major issue where the previous implementation had inconsistent early validation that accepted cards starting with 5 or 6 but later rejected non-51-55 prefixes. The new implementation cleanly validates brand rules after the checksum passes.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py (1)

1-24: Critical: Remove duplicate imports and validation block.

Lines 1-24 contain the complete validation logic, but lines 22-24 duplicate the imports and are followed by another complete copy of the same validation block (lines 26-41). This appears to be a merge conflict or copy-paste error that makes the code execute the same validation twice.

Apply this diff to remove the duplication:

 import sys
 
 from cs50 import get_int
 
 number = get_int("Number: ")
 
 # Store the first 1 and 2 digits of the credit card number entered
 beginning2 = int(str(number)[:2])
 beginning1 = int(str(number)[:1])
 
 # Check if the credit card is valid
 if not (
     beginning2 == 34
     or beginning2 == 37
     or beginning1 == 4
     or beginning1 == 5
     or beginning1 == 6
 ):
     print("INVALID")
     sys.exit()
-
-import sys
-
-from cs50 import get_int
-
-number = get_int("Number: ")
-
-# Store the first 1 and 2 digits of the credit card number entered
-beginning2 = int(str(number)[:2])
-beginning1 = int(str(number)[:1])
-
-# Check if the credit card is valid
-if not (
-    beginning2 == 34
-    or beginning2 == 37
-    or beginning1 == 4
-    or beginning1 == 5
-    or beginning1 == 6
-):
-    print("INVALID")
-    sys.exit()
 
 # Vars
 product = 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py (1)

64-69: Minor: Unused loop variable.

The loop variable i from enumerate is not used in either loop. Use sum() for cleaner code or iterate without enumerate.

Apply this diff:

-sumdigits = 0
-for i, item in enumerate(everyotherdig):
-    sumdigits += item
-
-othersum = 0
-for i, item in enumerate(others):
-    othersum += item
+sumdigits = sum(everyotherdig)
+othersum = sum(others)

Based on static analysis hints.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f876daf and 18b2788.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.14.3)
Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py

64-64: Loop control variable i not used within loop body

(B007)


68-68: Loop control variable i not used within loop body

(B007)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py (1)

84-106: Approve the brand detection logic structure.

The card brand detection logic is correctly structured with appropriate checks for:

  • AMEX: 34, 37 prefix
  • MasterCard: 51-55 prefix
  • Visa: 4 prefix
  • Minimum length of 13 digits

However, this will only work correctly once the critical checksum validation bug (lines 77-81) is fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant