-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
Corrected Algorithm and fix brand validation in credit.py #58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Corrected Algorithm and fix brand validation in credit.py #58
Conversation
WalkthroughRewrote Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant User
participant credit.py as Validator
participant Output
User->>Validator: provide card number (input -> str)
Note right of Validator: Single pass checksum\n(reverse per-digit loop)
Validator->>Validator: compute Luhn checksum (in-place)
Validator-->>Validator: derive validated flag (checksum % 10 == 0)
alt validated
Validator->>Validator: determine card type by length & prefix
Validator->>Output: print card type (AMEX/MASTERCARD/VISA)
else invalid
Validator->>Output: print "INVALID" and exit
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py (1)
1-24: Critical: Remove duplicate imports and validation block.Lines 1-24 contain the complete validation logic, but lines 22-24 duplicate the imports and are followed by another complete copy of the same validation block (lines 26-41). This appears to be a merge conflict or copy-paste error that makes the code execute the same validation twice.
Apply this diff to remove the duplication:
import sys from cs50 import get_int number = get_int("Number: ") # Store the first 1 and 2 digits of the credit card number entered beginning2 = int(str(number)[:2]) beginning1 = int(str(number)[:1]) # Check if the credit card is valid if not ( beginning2 == 34 or beginning2 == 37 or beginning1 == 4 or beginning1 == 5 or beginning1 == 6 ): print("INVALID") sys.exit() - -import sys - -from cs50 import get_int - -number = get_int("Number: ") - -# Store the first 1 and 2 digits of the credit card number entered -beginning2 = int(str(number)[:2]) -beginning1 = int(str(number)[:1]) - -# Check if the credit card is valid -if not ( - beginning2 == 34 - or beginning2 == 37 - or beginning1 == 4 - or beginning1 == 5 - or beginning1 == 6 -): - print("INVALID") - sys.exit() # Vars product = 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py (1)
64-69: Minor: Unused loop variable.The loop variable
ifromenumerateis not used in either loop. Usesum()for cleaner code or iterate withoutenumerate.Apply this diff:
-sumdigits = 0 -for i, item in enumerate(everyotherdig): - sumdigits += item - -othersum = 0 -for i, item in enumerate(others): - othersum += item +sumdigits = sum(everyotherdig) +othersum = sum(others)Based on static analysis hints.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.14.3)
Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py
64-64: Loop control variable i not used within loop body
(B007)
68-68: Loop control variable i not used within loop body
(B007)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Week 6/Problem Set 6/Sentimental Credit More/credit.py (1)
84-106: Approve the brand detection logic structure.The card brand detection logic is correctly structured with appropriate checks for:
- AMEX: 34, 37 prefix
- MasterCard: 51-55 prefix
- Visa: 4 prefix
- Minimum length of 13 digits
However, this will only work correctly once the critical checksum validation bug (lines 77-81) is fixed.
Fixed checksum logic, corrected brand detection rules, and removed redundant loops.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Refactor