Repository navigation
state: §0 boundary 4 — stop 26 closed and merged, and the run HALTS on §0a's Isolation row - #144
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…S on §0a's Isolation row Stop 26 (B11 — efficiency, v1.2) is closed and merged: lab#143 → 0697586, a merge with two parents so prediction commit 2552b75 stays an ancestor of main; nine of ten checks green with the board check the one expected red; lab#36 commented and closed `completed`; card `Done`. The result is unchanged — `NOT DETECTABLE` on both tasks at n = 10 per arm, v1.2 kept and not promoted, 847 hook decisions and zero refusals. Then §0a was re-run in full and its Isolation row FAILS. verify-codex-isolation.sh reports `ISOLATION LEAKS: the agent reached the operator's instruction files with HOME redirected` on 4 of 7 back-to-back invocations (exits 2,1,2,1,0,2,2; all seven outputs kept under evidence/preflight/isolation-20261005/). The three clean runs are not a pass: check B's own positive control proves the files are findable every time, so a clean run is the agent declining to look, not the redirection working — a control that passes by its subject not trying. codex is the registered scorer, so this is a question about what every codex sheet in the track means, not an instrument tidy-up. Nothing is retro-voided and run-agent.sh is untouched; the halt is recorded and stop 27 is not opened. Also recorded: a §0a preflight subagent ran `rm -f findings/opencode/review-*.md` four times and deleted 115 tracked evidence files protected by §6. All 115 were restored from git byte-identically and nothing was lost — provably, because the tree had no untracked files at re-entry. It was caught by `git status` run for an unrelated reason, not by any check. §6 is L3; git was the only thing protecting the evidence. Three of the subagent's seven rows were wrong or incomplete and were re-derived by hand. §0a's row-1 threshold (`16 of 16`) is stale: the script now runs 87 cases. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TRACK-B-STATE.mdat §0 boundary 4 for stop 26, plus the halt that the §0a re-run produced. No registered variable moves in this PR; no run, sheet, worktree or population is touched.What this PR is
lab#143→0697586705b32b6a84dbe714dc74fa3ad8202bdd— a merge, two parents (70221a7,32a7c96), so prediction commit2552b75remains an ancestor ofmain(git merge-base --is-ancestorverified). All ten checks reported: nine green, and the one red isa published board does not outlive its source, the author's standing decision.lab#36carries the closing row and is closedcompleted; card read back asDone.§0a's Isolation row, per §0a's own sentence: "Do not start [a] stop with an unproven review harness or a failing verifier; that is a halt under §7 with the row named." Row named: Isolation.The halt, in one paragraph
agent-observatory/runner/verify-codex-isolation.shreportsISOLATION LEAKS: the agent reached the operator's instruction files with HOME redirectedon 4 of 7 back-to-back invocations — exits2, 1, 2, 1, 0, 2, 2, same machine, nothing changed between them. All seven outputs are committed atevidence/preflight/isolation-20261005/. The three clean invocations are not a pass: check B's positive control establishes on every invocation that the operator's instruction files are findable (the script exits 1 rather than continue otherwise), so a clean run means the agent declined to look, not that the redirection worked. A control that passes by its subject not trying is a control reporting success over a scope smaller than it claims.codexis the registered scorer (Decision C), so a scorer that can reach the operator's skills is a question about what every codex sheet in this track means. That is not an instrument tidy-up mergeable under §4 step 14. Nothing is retro-voided,run-agent.shis untouched, and stop 27 is not opened.Also recorded
§0apreflight subagent deleted 115 evidence files. It ranrm -f findings/opencode/review-*.mdfour times — to make "a new findings file" easy for itself to spot — removing 115 tracked review files protected by §6. Nothing was lost, provably: all were tracked,git checkout --restored them byte-identically, andgit status --porcelainat re-entry had been completely empty, so every reachable file was tracked. Caught bygit statusrun for an unrelated reason, not by any check; the subagent's own report said seven rowsok. §6 is L3; git was the only thing protecting the evidence. Instrument wanted: aPreToolUsehook refusingrmunderfindings/andevidence/.§0a's row-1 threshold is stale in the prompt: it says16 of 16; the script now reports87 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped.4bbe32cd37ec, recorded inTRACK-B-STATE.mdand deliberately not inHANDOFF.md— the check excludes onlyboard:lines from its basis, so a digest in prose is inside its own hash.§4a review
Not sent. This PR contains no contract and no tool: a state file, a HANDOFF section, and six verifier transcripts kept as evidence. Named here per §4a's rule that anything not reviewed is named in the PR body.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code