DOCS: Fix variable name for submit action in documentation

[amanda-butler-unity]

Fix user-reported error in code snippet

Description

This PR addresses user-reported DOCATT-9051 to fix an error in the code snippet.

Testing status & QA

N/A - documentation-only change

Overall Product Risks

Please rate the potential complexity and halo effect from low to high for the reviewers. Note down potential risks to specific Editor branches if any.

• Complexity: 0
• Halo Effect: 0

This is a documentation-only change

Comments to reviewers

Please make sure this change is accurate.

Checklist

Before review:

• Changelog entry added.
  • Explains the change in Changed, Fixed, Added sections.
  • For API change contains an example snippet and/or migration example.
  • JIRA ticket linked, example (case %%). If it is a private issue, just add the case ID without a link.
  • Jira port for the next release set as "Resolved".
• Tests added/changed, if applicable.
  • Functional tests Area_CanDoX, Area_CanDoX_EvenIfYIsTheCase, Area_WhenIDoX_AndYHappens_ThisIsTheResult.
  • Performance tests.
  • Integration tests.
• Docs for new/changed API's.
  • Xmldoc cross references are set correctly.
  • Added explanation how the API works.
  • Usage code examples added.
  • The manual is updated, if needed.

During merge:

• Commit message for squash-merge is prefixed with one of the list:
  • NEW: ___.
  • FIX: ___.
  • DOCS: ___.
  • CHANGE: ___.
  • RELEASE: 1.1.0-preview.3.

[u-pr-agent]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🎫 Ticket compliance analysis ✅ DOCATT-9051 - Fully compliant Compliant requirements: Change the variable name in the third code snippet from 'submit' to 'submitAction' when calling WasReleasedThisFrame().

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪ This is a trivial documentation fix involving a single variable name change in a markdown file.

🏅 Score: 100 The PR accurately fixes the reported typo in the documentation code snippet as requested in the ticket.

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ No major issues detected

Update review

---

🤖 Helpful? Please react with 👍/👎 | Questions❓Please reach out in Slack #ask-u-pr-agent

[u-pr-agent]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

[codecov-github-com]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2305      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    77.95%   77.93%   -0.03%     
===========================================
  Files          477      477              
  Lines        97419    97445      +26     
===========================================
- Hits         75943    75941       -2     
- Misses       21476    21504      +28     

Flag	Coverage Δ
inputsystem_Windows_2022.3	5.54% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
inputsystem_Windows_6000.0	5.32% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
inputsystem_Windows_6000.2	5.32% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.