Skip to content

CHANGE: Increase timeouts in UI tests CI instabilities #2198

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jfreire-unity
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfreire-unity jfreire-unity commented Jun 27, 2025

Description

The tests change usually pass within 4.3 seconds. And they also fail frequently on the first time the run so this is an attempt to fix the instability reported internally by the team.

Testing status & QA

Will re-run CI at least 5 times and see if tests pass.

Overall Product Risks

Please rate the potential complexity and halo effect from low to high for the reviewers. Note down potential risks to specific Editor branches if any.

  • Complexity: 0
  • Halo Effect: 0

Comments to reviewers

Please describe any additional information such as what to focus on, or historical info for the reviewers.

Checklist

Before review:

  • Changelog entry added.
    • Explains the change in Changed, Fixed, Added sections.
    • For API change contains an example snippet and/or migration example.
    • JIRA ticket linked, example (case %%). If it is a private issue, just add the case ID without a link.
    • Jira port for the next release set as "Resolved".
  • Tests added/changed, if applicable.
    • Functional tests Area_CanDoX, Area_CanDoX_EvenIfYIsTheCase, Area_WhenIDoX_AndYHappens_ThisIsTheResult.
    • Performance tests.
    • Integration tests.
  • Docs for new/changed API's.
    • Xmldoc cross references are set correctly.
    • Added explanation how the API works.
    • Usage code examples added.
    • The manual is updated, if needed.

During merge:

  • Commit message for squash-merge is prefixed with one of the list:
    • NEW: ___.
    • FIX: ___.
    • DOCS: ___.
    • CHANGE: ___.
    • RELEASE: 1.1.0-preview.3.

After merge:

  • Create forward/backward port if needed. If you are blocked from creating a forward port now please add a task to ISX-1444.

Tests usually pay with 4.3 and they also fail so this is an attempt to fix the instability.
@codecov-github-com
Copy link

codecov-github-com bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2198      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    67.78%   67.79%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          367      367              
  Lines        53528    53528              
===========================================
+ Hits         36285    36291       +6     
+ Misses       17243    17237       -6     
Flag Coverage Δ
mac_2021.3_pkg 5.41% <ø> (ø)
mac_2021.3_project 70.43% <ø> (ø)
mac_2022.3_pkg 5.19% <ø> (ø)
mac_2022.3_project 65.29% <ø> (ø)
mac_6000.0_pkg 5.20% <ø> (ø)
mac_6000.0_project 67.71% <ø> (ø)
mac_6000.1_pkg 5.20% <ø> (ø)
mac_6000.1_project 67.71% <ø> (ø)
mac_6000.2_pkg 5.20% <ø> (ø)
mac_6000.2_project 67.70% <ø> (ø)
mac_trunk_pkg 5.20% <ø> (ø)
mac_trunk_project 67.70% <ø> (ø)
win_2021.3_pkg 5.42% <ø> (ø)
win_2021.3_project 70.50% <ø> (ø)
win_2022.3_pkg 5.19% <ø> (ø)
win_2022.3_project 65.36% <ø> (ø)
win_6000.0_pkg 5.20% <ø> (ø)
win_6000.0_project 67.78% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
win_6000.1_pkg 5.20% <ø> (ø)
win_6000.1_project 67.68% <ø> (-0.11%) ⬇️
win_6000.2_pkg 5.20% <ø> (ø)
win_6000.2_project 67.78% <ø> (ø)
win_trunk_pkg 5.20% <ø> (ø)
win_trunk_project 67.78% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant