Dear FSDA team,
While using getFundamentals, I noticed that the RankBy parameter currently lacks autocomplete choices in the functionSignatures.json file.
Since getFundamentals can return up to 176 fields, having no autocomplete makes it quite hard for the user to quickly rank the output without manually looking up the exact field names. Conversely, adding all 176 fields to the choices would clutter the UI.
Proposal:
I suggest adding a curated list of the ~10 most common performance and valuation metrics to the autocomplete choices (e.g., marketCap, trailingPE, priceToBook, returnOnEquity, etc.). This would greatly improve the UX for the most standard use cases.
I can open a quick PR with this JSON update if you agree with the approach
Dear FSDA team,
While using
getFundamentals, I noticed that theRankByparameter currently lacks autocomplete choices in thefunctionSignatures.jsonfile.Since
getFundamentalscan return up to 176 fields, having no autocomplete makes it quite hard for the user to quickly rank the output without manually looking up the exact field names. Conversely, adding all 176 fields to the choices would clutter the UI.Proposal:
I suggest adding a curated list of the ~10 most common performance and valuation metrics to the autocomplete choices (e.g.,
marketCap,trailingPE,priceToBook,returnOnEquity, etc.). This would greatly improve the UX for the most standard use cases.I can open a quick PR with this JSON update if you agree with the approach