Skip to content

Conversation

@phipsgabler
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 1, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #55 into master will increase coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #55      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage    80.2%   80.27%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines         864      867       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          693      696       +3     
  Misses        171      171
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/compiler.jl 93.63% <0%> (+0.12%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 534826c...50e6ede. Read the comment docs.

@phipsgabler
Copy link
Member Author

This is only failing due to obscure build errors in 1.1 and 1.3...?

@devmotion
Copy link
Member

Yeah seems unrelated. I just restarted the failed jobs to check if it works with the new release of Libtask.

@devmotion devmotion merged commit 70b65c6 into master Apr 2, 2020
@devmotion devmotion deleted the phg/forgotten_test branch April 2, 2020 16:43
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2022
companion pr to [#55 AbstractPPL](TuringLang/AbstractPPL.jl#56), moving `AbstractContext` and `evaluate!!` to `AbstractPPL` and adding imports to `DynamiclPPL`. 

I couldn't find an empty definition for `evaluate!!` in DynamicPPL. Is there one? 

Co-authored-by: Hong Ge <3279477+yebai@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: David Widmann <devmotion@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants