-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
Allow usage of array literals on LHS of ~
#261
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4138516
treat vectors on LHS as literals
torfjelde f9ae0a8
version bump
torfjelde d76f60b
added test for array literals
torfjelde d6a1e42
simplified the isliteral check
torfjelde 412548d
formatting
torfjelde b993b97
dont allow empty literals
torfjelde 6bb5412
added some tests for isliteral
torfjelde d328583
formatting
torfjelde f8593cb
fixed typo in tests
torfjelde 3810eff
bump Bijectors for tests
torfjelde 8532d8d
Merge branch 'master' into tor/support-for-array-literals
yebai File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This might be a bit general, e.g., also tuples of numbers or arrays of tuples of numbers or arrays of arrays of numbers etc are considered as literals now, in contrast to what the docstring mentions. But maybe this was your intention?
In any case, I guess it would be good to add some simple tests.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That was my intention yeah. These might still throw errors later when calling the model, e.g. mby there's no impl for
assumefor atuple, but figured it was a good idea to not be very restrictive in the actual model-macro as we/people might add implementations for their distribution or w/e.Yeah I'll add some 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good now?