Skip to content

Conversation

@penelopeysm
Copy link
Member

there was a check against 1.12.0, but 1.12.1 dropped already so this shouldn't be the case. the tests used to be failing but that's because it was loading mooncake, which i disabled in TuringLang/Turing.jl#2705, so fingers crossed the integration test passes this time

@penelopeysm penelopeysm merged commit 22740ed into main Oct 27, 2025
18 checks passed
@penelopeysm penelopeysm deleted the py/integ branch October 27, 2025 22:24
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 27, 2025

Benchmark Report for Commit 626d306

Computer Information

Julia Version 1.11.7
Commit f2b3dbda30a (2025-09-08 12:10 UTC)
Build Info:
  Official https://julialang.org/ release
Platform Info:
  OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
  CPU: 4 × AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
  WORD_SIZE: 64
  LLVM: libLLVM-16.0.6 (ORCJIT, znver3)
Threads: 1 default, 0 interactive, 1 GC (on 4 virtual cores)

Benchmark Results

┌───────────────────────┬───────┬─────────────┬───────────────────┬────────┬────────────────┬─────────────────┐
│                 Model │   Dim │  AD Backend │           VarInfo │ Linked │ t(eval)/t(ref) │ t(grad)/t(eval) │
├───────────────────────┼───────┼─────────────┼───────────────────┼────────┼────────────────┼─────────────────┤
│ Simple assume observe │     1 │ forwarddiff │             typed │  false │            6.7 │             1.7 │
│           Smorgasbord │   201 │ forwarddiff │             typed │  false │          753.3 │            44.1 │
│           Smorgasbord │   201 │ forwarddiff │ simple_namedtuple │   true │          418.2 │            60.8 │
│           Smorgasbord │   201 │ forwarddiff │           untyped │   true │          796.3 │            39.5 │
│           Smorgasbord │   201 │ forwarddiff │       simple_dict │   true │         6827.7 │            25.6 │
│           Smorgasbord │   201 │ reversediff │             typed │   true │          757.9 │            55.9 │
│           Smorgasbord │   201 │    mooncake │             typed │   true │          812.6 │             5.5 │
│           Smorgasbord │   201 │      enzyme │             typed │   true │          924.6 │             4.2 │
│    Loop univariate 1k │  1000 │    mooncake │             typed │   true │         3977.1 │             5.6 │
│       Multivariate 1k │  1000 │    mooncake │             typed │   true │         1055.3 │             8.8 │
│   Loop univariate 10k │ 10000 │    mooncake │             typed │   true │        44109.4 │             5.4 │
│      Multivariate 10k │ 10000 │    mooncake │             typed │   true │         9473.0 │             9.5 │
│               Dynamic │    10 │    mooncake │             typed │   true │          119.5 │            11.6 │
│              Submodel │     1 │    mooncake │             typed │   true │            8.8 │             6.7 │
│                   LDA │    12 │ reversediff │             typed │   true │         1041.1 │             2.0 │
└───────────────────────┴───────┴─────────────┴───────────────────┴────────┴────────────────┴─────────────────┘

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 27, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.30%. Comparing base (32c5847) to head (626d306).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1094   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.30%   81.30%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines        3749     3749           
=======================================
  Hits         3048     3048           
  Misses        701      701           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@penelopeysm
Copy link
Member Author

It still tried to load Mooncake, I don't know why, but meh.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants