-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
Unify argument order in phasepoint and transition #435
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
* Update cuda.jl * Apply suggestions from code review Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
It is more prudent to mark this as a breaking release, given that some other packages likely depend on |
Yeah, I bumped the version to 0.8.0, so we can release a breaking change. As far as I know, Turing.jl is using |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks all good to me. Thanks for this, I think I've tripped over that argument ordering once or twice myself.
Excellent work - @ErikQQY, can you add an item to HISTORY.md before merging? |
Fix: #248
Now we should only use
transition(rng, h, τ, z)
ortransition(rng, h, κ, z)
.