Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Align terminology with INES-spec #622

Open
clizbe opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Align terminology with INES-spec #622

clizbe opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers Type: epic Epic issues (collection of smaller tasks towards a goal) Zone: code architecture Changes to the structure or fundamentals
Milestone

Comments

@clizbe
Copy link
Member

clizbe commented May 6, 2024

What and Why

For simplicity and clarity.
(List the changes as issues.)
Also consider in the names of parameters the comment here

Possible Drawbacks

Related Issues

@clizbe clizbe added good first issue Good for newcomers Zone: code architecture Changes to the structure or fundamentals Type: epic Epic issues (collection of smaller tasks towards a goal) labels May 6, 2024
@clizbe clizbe changed the title Align terminology with ESDL Align terminology with INES-spec Jul 29, 2024
@clizbe clizbe changed the title Align terminology with INES-spec Align terminology with INES-spec / ESDL Jul 29, 2024
@clizbe clizbe added this to the M4 - End Dec milestone Jul 29, 2024
@clizbe clizbe mentioned this issue Jul 29, 2024
28 tasks
@datejada
Copy link
Member

The INES information is available here: https://github.com/energy-modelling-workbench/ines-spec

@clizbe clizbe changed the title Align terminology with INES-spec / ESDL Align terminology with INES-spec Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers Type: epic Epic issues (collection of smaller tasks towards a goal) Zone: code architecture Changes to the structure or fundamentals
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants