Create ObjectNames sql output is broken

[Vincent-Michael]

Support current:

WowPacketParser/WowPacketParser/Store/Objects/ObjectName.cs

Lines 9 to 10 in 888f648

	[DBFieldName("ObjectType", true)]
	public ObjectType? ObjectType;

WowPacketParser/WowPacketParser/Enums/ObjectType.cs

Lines 3 to 17 in 888f648

	public enum ObjectType
	{
	Object = 0,
	Item = 1,
	Container = 2,
	Unit = 3,
	Player = 4,
	GameObject = 5,
	DynamicObject = 6,
	Corpse = 7,
	AreaTrigger = 8,
	SceneObject = 9,
	Conversation = 10,
	Map = 11
	}

Should but:

WowPacketParser/WowPacketParser/Enums/StoreNameType.cs

Lines 5 to 29 in 888f648

	public enum StoreNameType
	{
	None,
	Spell,
	Map,
	LFGDungeon,
	Battleground,
	Unit,
	GameObject,
	Item,
	Quest,
	QuestObjective,
	QuestGreeting,
	Opcode, // Packet
	PageText,
	NpcText,
	Gossip,
	Zone,
	Area,
	AreaTrigger,
	Phase,
	Player,
	Currency,
	Achievement
	}

WowPacketParser/WowPacketParser/SQL/SQLDatabase.cs

Lines 53 to 61 in 888f648

	public static void GrabNameData()
	{
	if (!SQLConnector.Connected())
	throw new DataException("Cannot get DB data without an active DB connection.");
	foreach (StoreNameType objectType in ObjectTypes)
	NameStores.Add(objectType, GetDict<int, string>(
	$"SELECT `Id`, `Name` FROM `ObjectNames` WHERE `ObjectType`='{objectType}';"));
	}

--- Want to back this issue? **[Post a bounty on it!](https://www.bountysource.com/issues/29479773-create-objectnames-sql-output-is-broken?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F457228&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github)** We accept bounties via [Bountysource](https://www.bountysource.com/?utm_campaign=plugin&utm_content=tracker%2F457228&utm_medium=issues&utm_source=github).

[Carbenium]

It seems it was already messed up before my changes. See

WowPacketParser/WowPacketParser/Parsing/Parsers/GameObjectHandler.cs

Lines 58 to 63 in 11e4117

	var objectName = new ObjectName
	{
	ObjectType = ObjectType.GameObject,
	Name = gameObject.Name
	};
	Storage.ObjectNames.Add((uint)entry.Key, objectName, packet.TimeSpan);

[Vincent-Michael]

hm okay, we should rewrite with #219