Conversation
WalkthroughAdded two new files under 2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/week4-challenge: a one-line info text and a solution document describing Git commands and branching strategy. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/week4-challenge/info.txt(1 hunks)2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/week4-challenge/solution.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/week4-challenge/solution.md
3-3: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
5-5: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
| ### Commands that I used: | ||
|
|
||
| ``` | ||
| git init → Initializes a repo in my local | ||
| git add info.txt → Stages a file to that repo | ||
| git commit -m "Message" → Final commit | ||
| git push -u origin main → Push commit to remote | ||
| git pull origin main → Verify/pull changes | ||
| git log → View commit history | ||
| git branch feature-update → Creates new branch | ||
| git switch <branch name> → Switching branches | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| ### Brief explanation on why branching strategies are important in collaborative development: | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix heading hierarchy to avoid lint errors.
Line 3 jumps from # to ###, and Line 18 repeats the same. Adjust both to ## … so the document increments levels correctly.
As per static analysis hints, apply:
-### Commands that I used:
+## Commands that I used:
-### Brief explanation on why branching strategies are important in collaborative development:
+## Brief explanation on why branching strategies are important in collaborative development:📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ### Commands that I used: | |
| ``` | |
| git init → Initializes a repo in my local | |
| git add info.txt → Stages a file to that repo | |
| git commit -m "Message" → Final commit | |
| git push -u origin main → Push commit to remote | |
| git pull origin main → Verify/pull changes | |
| git log → View commit history | |
| git branch feature-update → Creates new branch | |
| git switch <branch name> → Switching branches | |
| ``` | |
| --- | |
| ### Brief explanation on why branching strategies are important in collaborative development: | |
| ## Commands that I used: | |
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
3-3: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h3
(MD001, heading-increment)
5-5: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In 2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/week4-challenge/solution.md around lines 3
to 19, the heading hierarchy is inconsistent (jumping from `#` to `###` and
repeating `###`), causing lint errors; change both `###` headings at those
locations to `##` so they correctly follow the top-level `#` and maintain proper
incremental heading levels, then save and re-run the linter to confirm the
errors are resolved.
| ``` | ||
| git init → Initializes a repo in my local | ||
| git add info.txt → Stages a file to that repo | ||
| git commit -m "Message" → Final commit | ||
| git push -u origin main → Push commit to remote | ||
| git pull origin main → Verify/pull changes | ||
| git log → View commit history | ||
| git branch feature-update → Creates new branch | ||
| git switch <branch name> → Switching branches | ||
| ``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add a language hint to the fenced block.
The command list lacks a fence language, tripping MD040. Annotate it (e.g., bash) so tooling renders it properly.
As per static analysis hints, apply:
-```
+```bash
git init → Initializes a repo in my local
git add info.txt → Stages a file to that repo
git commit -m "Message" → Final commit
git push -u origin main → Push commit to remote
git pull origin main → Verify/pull changes
git log → View commit history
git branch feature-update → Creates new branch
git switch <branch name> → Switching branches
<details>
<summary>🧰 Tools</summary>
<details>
<summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)</summary>
5-5: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
</details>
</details>
<details>
<summary>🤖 Prompt for AI Agents</summary>
In 2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/week4-challenge/solution.md lines 5-14, the
fenced code block lacks a language hint causing MD040; add a language identifier
(e.g., bash) immediately after the opening so the block starts withbash
and keep the existing content and closing ``` unchanged.
</details>
<!-- fingerprinting:phantom:triton:sabertoothed -->
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit -->
|
Stale pull request message |
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit