Skip to content

Added task for week-9 : Ansible#420

Merged
LondheShubham153 merged 1 commit intoTrainWithShubham:masterfrom
Amitabh-DevOps:week9
May 1, 2025
Merged

Added task for week-9 : Ansible#420
LondheShubham153 merged 1 commit intoTrainWithShubham:masterfrom
Amitabh-DevOps:week9

Conversation

@Amitabh-DevOps
Copy link
Contributor

@Amitabh-DevOps Amitabh-DevOps commented Mar 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Introduced a comprehensive challenge that guides users through various Ansible automation tasks.
    • Provided detailed instructions on configuring dynamic inventories, developing robust playbooks, organizing automation with roles and variables, securing sensitive data, and orchestrating multi-tier deployments.
    • Added a bonus section integrating Terraform for multi-environment setups, along with submission guidelines and additional learning resources.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The update adds a detailed document outlining an "Ansible Automation Challenge" as part of the "90DaysOfDevOps" initiative. The document specifies five core tasks on various aspects of Ansible automation, including dynamic inventory configuration, Nginx playbook development, organizing playbooks with roles, secure data handling with Ansible Vault, and multi-tier deployment orchestration. A bonus task linking Terraform with Ansible for multi-environment setups is also provided. The submission instructions require documenting processes in a solution.md file, and additional learning resources are listed at the end.

Changes

File(s) Summary
2025/ansible/README.md Added comprehensive challenge tasks covering dynamic inventory, Nginx playbook development, playbook organization, secure vault usage, orchestration, and a bonus Terraform integration task.

Suggested reviewers

  • LondheShubham153

Poem

I'm a clever little rabbit, hopping through code and cheer,
With Ansible tasks upon my trail, innovation's very near.
Playbooks dance like twirling leaves 🍃, vaults keep secrets tight,
A Terraform bonus makes me smile, with DevOps shining bright.
Burrowing through challenges, I share this automated delight.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
2025/ansible/README.md (3)

32-34: Review Interview Question Punctuation.
Consider revising the interview question on line 34 to improve clarity. For example, adding a comma before “and” can help separate the two independent clauses:

- - What challenges do dynamic inventory sources present and how can you mitigate them?
+ - What challenges do dynamic inventory sources present, and how can you mitigate them?
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~34-~34: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...ges do dynamic inventory sources present and how can you mitigate them? --- ## Tas...

(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)


143-147: Check Terminology Consistency.
Static analysis suggests reviewing the spelling of “multi-environment” on lines 143 and 147. If the project’s style guide prefers a single-word form (e.g., “multienvironment”), please update accordingly for consistency.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[misspelling] ~143-~143: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...utputs integrate with Ansible to manage multi-environment deployments. Interview Questions: ...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_ENVIRONMENT)


[misspelling] ~147-~147: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...challenges might you face when managing multi-environment configurations, and how do you overcome...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_ENVIRONMENT)


157-160: Suggest Specifying Code Block Language.
The fenced code block displaying the PR title (lines 158–160) currently does not specify a language. For better markdown linting and clarity, consider adding a language identifier (for example, text):

-     ```
-     Week 9 Challenge - Ansible Automation Challenge
-     ```
+     ```text
+     Week 9 Challenge - Ansible Automation Challenge
+     ```
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)

159-159: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a350ef6 and 77602b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • 2025/ansible/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
2025/ansible/README.md

[uncategorized] ~34-~34: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...ges do dynamic inventory sources present and how can you mitigate them? --- ## Tas...

(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE_2)


[misspelling] ~143-~143: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...utputs integrate with Ansible to manage multi-environment deployments. Interview Questions: ...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_ENVIRONMENT)


[misspelling] ~147-~147: This word is normally spelled as one.
Context: ...challenges might you face when managing multi-environment configurations, and how do you overcome...

(EN_COMPOUNDS_MULTI_ENVIRONMENT)

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
2025/ansible/README.md

159-159: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
null

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

🔇 Additional comments (13)
2025/ansible/README.md (13)

1-3: Clear Introduction.
The title and opening paragraph set a strong context for the Ansible challenge and clearly introduce the theme for Week 9.


5-9: Clear Submission Instructions.
The guidelines for forking the repository, documenting the process in solution.md, and submitting the work are concise and easy to follow.


12-15: Well-Defined Task 1.
The description for installing Ansible and configuring a dynamic inventory is clear and contextualizes the production challenges effectively.


17-30: Detailed Steps for Task 1.
The step-by-step instructions covering installation, dynamic inventory configuration, connectivity testing, and documentation are thorough and actionable.


38-57: Comprehensive Task 2 for Nginx Setup.
The scenario and detailed steps for creating a robust playbook to install and configure Nginx—including using Jinja2 templates and implementing asynchronous execution with error handling—are very well articulated.


61-80: Well-Structured Task 3 on Playbook Organization.
The instructions for reorganizing playbooks into roles and managing advanced variable hierarchies are clear. The associated interview questions also prompt thoughtful discussion around scalability and collaboration.


83-102: Thorough Guidance for Ansible Vault Techniques.
The steps on encrypting sensitive data with Ansible Vault, integrating multiple encrypted files into playbooks, and verifying decryption are comprehensive and align well with real-world secure data management practices.


105-122: Effective Task 5: Multi-Tier Deployments.
The instructions for orchestrating a multi-tier application—including managing execution order and asynchronous tasks—are well-detailed and practical.


125-142: Clear Bonus Task Details.
The bonus task that integrates Terraform with Ansible is clearly outlined. The steps for provisioning with Terraform and configuring with Ansible are detailed; consider linking to Terraform documentation for further reading if desired.


161-171: Good PR Submission Guidelines.
The detailed steps for submitting the pull request, writing a descriptive PR description, and sharing your experience on LinkedIn are clear and encourage a comprehensive submission.


175-180: Useful Resource Section.
The curated TrainWithShubham resources provide valuable additional information that can aid in mastering Ansible and the associated concepts.


182-189: Comprehensive Additional Resources.
The links to the Ansible official documentation, modules documentation, Galaxy, and best practices offer a solid reference base.


190-194: Clear Final Instructions.
The concluding statement effectively summarizes the expectations and reinforces the challenge’s learning objectives.

@LondheShubham153 LondheShubham153 merged commit ffec91b into TrainWithShubham:master May 1, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants