Week 4 Challenge - DevOps Batch 9: Git & GitHub Advanced Challenge Solution#380
Week 4 Challenge - DevOps Batch 9: Git & GitHub Advanced Challenge Solution#380SuperSection wants to merge 4 commits intoTrainWithShubham:masterfrom
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces two comprehensive guide documents for the #90DaysOfDevOps program. The first document provides detailed, step-by-step instructions for the Week 4 Challenge, covering essential Git operations such as forking, cloning, initializing repositories, committing changes, configuring remotes with a Personal Access Token (PAT), branch creation, and SSH authentication. The second document focuses on advanced Git practices, including creating pull requests, undoing changes, stashing, cherry-picking, rebasing, and common branching strategies. Each task is structured with clear instructions and accompanying images. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/solution.md (2)
142-147: Positive and Engaging Conclusion with a Note on Tone
The conclusion effectively conveys the sense of accomplishment while summarizing the challenge. One minor suggestion: if a more formal tone is desired, consider moderating punctuation (e.g., the exclamation mark).🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~144-~144: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 3 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2040 characters long)
Context: ...eek 4 Challenge** of #90DaysOfDevOps! This challenge deepened my understandin...(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
16-16: Verify Image References and File Resources
All image placeholders (e.g.,image.png,image-1.png, etc.) are used appropriately to support the instructions. Please double-check that these image paths are correct and that the images are optimized for display in the documentation.Also applies to: 26-26, 48-48, 62-62, 96-96, 103-107, 129-129, 138-138, 146-146
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (13)
2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-1.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-10.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-11.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-12.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-2.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-3.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-4.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-5.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-6.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-7.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-8.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image-9.pngis excluded by!**/*.png2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/image.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/solution.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/solution.md
[style] ~144-~144: Using many exclamation marks might seem excessive (in this case: 3 exclamation marks for a text that’s 2040 characters long)
Context: ...eek 4 Challenge** of #90DaysOfDevOps! This challenge deepened my understandin...
(EN_EXCESSIVE_EXCLAMATION)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
2025/git/01_Git_and_Github_Basics/solution.md (13)
1-7: Clear and Informative Introduction
The title and introduction set the stage very well for the Week 4 Challenge, clearly outlining the focus areas and what the reader can expect.
9-17: Well-Structured Task 1: Forking the Repository
The instructions for forking are clear and enriched with a link to the original repository and an accompanying image placeholder. This will help users easily understand the process.
20-24: Accurate Cloning Instructions
The code block for cloning the forked repository is well-formed. It uses a placeholder for the fork URL and includes the necessary commands in a sequential manner, which makes it easy to follow.
32-38: Concise Git Repository Initialization
The steps to create a directory, change into it, and initialize a Git repository are straightforward. This section is clear and properly organized.
40-46: Clear File Creation and Commit Process
The commands to create a file (info.txt), add it to the staging area, and commit it with a descriptive message are correct. This reinforces good Git practices for beginners.
52-60: Accurate Remote Configuration with PAT
The section detailing how to set up the remote using a Personal Access Token is precise. The placeholder notations remind the user to replace values with their own, which is essential for secure setup.
66-72: Straightforward Git Log Command
The instructions for viewing the commit history usinggit logare simple and effective. This code block will help users verify their commit history with ease.
80-85: Effective Branch Creation and Switching
The commands for creating a new branch and switching to it (git branch feature-updateandgit switch feature-update) are well presented in their own code block. This clear segmentation makes the branching process easy to understand.
87-94: Clear Instructions for Modifying and Pushing on a Feature Branch
Appending details to the file, adding, committing, and pushing changes are all covered precisely. The command sequence is logical and easy to follow for users updating their feature branch.
98-108: Comprehensive Merging Process Overview
The guide explains how to create a pull request and merge changes effectively. The inclusion of optional steps (like branch deletion) adds useful context to various workflow preferences.
115-117: Correct SSH Key Generation Command
The SSH key generation command is accurately presented, using the preferreded25519algorithm for enhanced security, alongside a helpful comment for user context.
123-125: Clear Public Key Retrieval Instruction
The command to display the SSH public key (cat ~/.ssh/id_ed25519.pub) is succinct and valuable for users to copy the key to their GitHub settings.
133-136: Accurate Remote URL Update for SSH Authentication
Updating the remote URL to use SSH is well-documented here. The instructions prompt users to replace the placeholder with their actual GitHub username, ensuring the configuration works correctly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
2025/git/02_Git_and_Github_Advanced/solution.md (4)
11-17: Fork and Clone Instructions are Clear
The step-by-step instructions accompanied by a bash code block provide a straightforward guide to forking and cloning a repository. Consider adding a note that placeholders (e.g.,<your-forked-repo-url>and<repo-name>) should be replaced with actual values when the user executes these commands.
33-35: Expanding the PR Creation Step
The step "4. Open a PR on GitHub, Request Review, and Merge After Approval" is mentioned without additional details. Consider expanding this section with further guidance or references (e.g., adding screenshots or more explicit instructions) to ensure users fully understand the process.
54-104: Task 2: Undoing Changes – Reset & Revert
This section effectively demonstrates various reset modes (soft, mixed, and hard) along with thegit revertcommand. The step-by-step examples and code blocks are clear. It might be helpful to include a brief caution regarding the risks of usinggit reset --hardto prevent unintended data loss.
106-135: Task 3: Stashing Instructions are Clear
The guide details how to stash changes, switch branches, and reapply the stash. The differentiation betweengit stash popandgit stash applyis useful. Note that minor punctuation tweaks could be applied to enhance clarity (as hinted by static analysis), but these are very minor.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~132-~132: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...dgit stash apply** -git stash pop: Applies the stashed changes and removes...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~133-~133: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...from the stash list. -git stash apply: Applies the stashed changes but keeps t...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
2025/git/02_Git_and_Github_Advanced/solution.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
2025/git/02_Git_and_Github_Advanced/solution.md
[uncategorized] ~132-~132: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...d git stash apply** - git stash pop: Applies the stashed changes and removes...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
[uncategorized] ~133-~133: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...from the stash list. - git stash apply: Applies the stashed changes but keeps t...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
2025/git/02_Git_and_Github_Advanced/solution.md (11)
1-4: Introduction is Clear and Informative
The title and the opening paragraph set the stage well for the advanced Git challenge. The overall context of the document is clear.
7-10: Task 1 Header is Well Structured
The header "## Task 1: Working with Pull Requests (PRs)" clearly indicates the beginning of the first task. The use of markdown formatting is effective for readability.
18-26: Feature Branch Creation and Commit Process is Detailed
The document clearly describes how to create a feature branch, make changes, and commit them. The code block example is concise and easy to follow.
27-32: Push Command for Feature Branch is Concise
The instructions for pushing the feature branch to the remote repository are clear and appropriately formatted with the enclosed code block.
36-44: Best Practices for Writing PR Descriptions are Well Covered
The bullet-point list offers practical advice on writing clear titles, descriptions, and incorporating screenshots. This section is well-written and provides valuable best practices.
45-51: Handling Review Comments Section is Clear
The guidelines provided for managing review comments—including using additional commits and interactive rebasing—are concise and actionable.
137-169: Task 4: Cherry-Picking is Well Detailed
The instructions for cherry-picking include clear examples for finding a commit, applying it, and resolving conflicts. The additional notes on its benefits and risks provide a comprehensive understanding for the user.
171-209: Task 5: Rebasing Instructions are Comprehensive
The section explains fetching changes, rebasing, and continuing after conflict resolution effectively. The comparative table between merge and rebase further clarifies the differences. Best practices for interactive rebase add extra value for maintaining a clean commit history.
211-242: Task 6: Branching Strategies are Clearly Outlined
The document clearly distinguishes between Git Flow, GitHub Flow, and Trunk-Based Development. The included example of simulating a Git workflow via branch creation commands is a nice practical touch.
244-263: Final Submission Steps are Concise and Actionable
The final steps detail the submission process—from adding and committing changes to pushing them and creating a pull request. Including steps to share the experience on LinkedIn rounds out the process in a practical manner.
264-267: Conclusion Effectively Summarizes the Document
The concluding section succinctly restates the key learning outcomes, reinforcing the importance of mastering these Git concepts for effective CI/CD practices.
|
Stale pull request message |
1 participant
About the PR
This PR adds the solution for the Week 4 Challenge of the 90DaysOfDevOps 2025 . The challenge focused on practicing essential Git and GitHub commands, including repository management, branching strategies, authentication, and SSH setup.
📂 Changes Included
Covered Topics:
🚀 How to Review?
✨ Gratitude and Open for Discussion
Any feedback or suggestions are welcome!
Looking forward to contributing more in the #90DaysOfDevOps journey.
Summary by CodeRabbit