Skip to content

Conversation

@amindadgar
Copy link
Member

@amindadgar amindadgar commented Apr 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced system stability for media processing tasks with an automatic retry mechanism that helps reduce interruptions during temporary issues.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a RetryPolicy mechanism into the MediaWikiETLWorkflow class. Four key activity executions—get_hivemind_mediawiki_platforms, extract_mediawiki, transform_mediawiki_data, and load_mediawiki_data—are modified to include retry logic. Each activity now retries up to three times with a one-minute interval between attempts, improving the workflow's resilience to transient failures.

Changes

File Summary of Changes
hivemind_etl/.../workflows.py Integrated RetryPolicy into calls for get_hivemind_mediawiki_platforms, extract_mediawiki, transform_mediawiki_data, and load_mediawiki_data with a 1-minute initial interval and a maximum of 3 attempts.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant W as MediaWikiETLWorkflow
    participant P as get_hivemind_mediawiki_platforms
    participant E as extract_mediawiki
    participant T as transform_mediawiki_data
    participant L as load_mediawiki_data

    W->>P: Call with RetryPolicy (1-min interval, max 3 attempts)
    alt On Success
        P-->>W: Return platforms
    else On Failure
        P-->>W: Error after 3 attempts
    end

    W->>E: Call with RetryPolicy (1-min interval, max 3 attempts)
    alt On Success
        E-->>W: Return extraction result
    else On Failure
        E-->>W: Error after 3 attempts
    end

    W->>T: Call with RetryPolicy (1-min interval, max 3 attempts)
    alt On Success
        T-->>W: Return transformed data
    else On Failure
        T-->>W: Error after 3 attempts
    end

    W->>L: Call with RetryPolicy (1-min interval, max 3 attempts)
    alt On Success
        L-->>W: Confirmation of load
    else On Failure
        L-->>W: Error after 3 attempts
    end
Loading

Poem

I'm a sprightly rabbit, coding with glee,
Hop, hop, hop—retrying tirelessly.
With each minute's pause and three tries in store,
My workflow's resilient, now stronger than before.
Through loops and leaps, I celebrate more! 🐇✨

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
hivemind_etl/mediawiki/workflows.py (3)

53-56: Consider exponential backoff for long-running extract activity

The retry policy is appropriately added to the extract activity, but given this activity has a 5-day timeout, you might consider implementing an exponential backoff strategy instead of a fixed 1-minute interval for more efficient retries of this long-running operation.

 retry_policy=RetryPolicy(
     initial_interval=timedelta(minutes=1),
     maximum_attempts=3,
+    backoff_coefficient=2.0,
+    maximum_interval=timedelta(minutes=10),
 ),

64-67: Consider error filtering in retry policy

The transform activity's retry policy looks good, but you might want to consider adding non-retryable error types for scenarios where retrying wouldn't help (like data validation errors). The activity's implementation already has exception handling, so this complements it well.

 retry_policy=RetryPolicy(
     initial_interval=timedelta(minutes=1),
     maximum_attempts=3,
+    non_retryable_error_types=["ValueError", "KeyError"],
 ),

31-39: Consider extracting the retry policy to a constant

All four activities use the same retry policy configuration. To improve maintainability and ensure consistency, consider extracting this to a shared constant at the top of the file.

 import logging
 from datetime import timedelta
 
 from temporalio import workflow
 from temporalio.common import RetryPolicy
 
+# Standard retry policy for MediaWiki ETL activities
+STANDARD_RETRY_POLICY = RetryPolicy(
+    initial_interval=timedelta(minutes=1),
+    maximum_attempts=3,
+)
 
 with workflow.unsafe.imports_passed_through():
     from hivemind_etl.mediawiki.activities import (

Then in each activity execution:

 retry_policy=RetryPolicy(
     initial_interval=timedelta(minutes=1),
     maximum_attempts=3,
 ),

Would become:

 retry_policy=STANDARD_RETRY_POLICY,

Also applies to: 49-57, 60-68, 71-80

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d9f1fd6 and e69b1be.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • hivemind_etl/mediawiki/workflows.py (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
hivemind_etl/mediawiki/workflows.py (1)
hivemind_etl/mediawiki/activities.py (1)
  • transform_mediawiki_data (75-85)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: ci / test / Test
  • GitHub Check: ci / lint / Lint
🔇 Additional comments (3)
hivemind_etl/mediawiki/workflows.py (3)

5-5: Appropriate import added for RetryPolicy

The RetryPolicy import from temporalio.common is correctly added to support the retry capabilities being implemented in the workflow activities.


35-38: Good addition of retry policy for get_hivemind_mediawiki_platforms

Adding retry capabilities to the platform retrieval activity improves resilience against transient failures. The retry policy with 3 maximum attempts and a 1-minute interval is appropriate for this activity which has a 1-minute timeout.


76-79: Consistent retry policy for load activity

The retry policy for the load activity maintains consistency with the other activities, which is good for maintainability. The 3 maximum attempts with a 1-minute interval aligns well with the 30-minute timeout of this activity.

@amindadgar amindadgar merged commit 1e6a67e into main Apr 13, 2025
3 checks passed
@amindadgar amindadgar linked an issue Apr 14, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat: mediaWiki ETL!

2 participants