forked from petercombs/HybridSliceSeq
-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 0
Merging in months of code changes #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
To do this, run
make QSUBBERLOCAL=--local [TARGETS]
running locally should allow output to go to the screen, which is easier
than looking up the log files, if they even get saved.
Major problem is that this is perturbed by different maternal deposition. So I'm going to start working on HybridUtils to deal with that in a saner way.
More flexible (includes t-tests and a more simplistic cutoff), and automatically treats the different genotypes separately.
This probably should just happen in the script that's dedicated to it, to save time when it's not needed.
Only the best bug fixes.
This way is more consistent, and probably easier to understand what's going on.
Progress bar works by either using the progressbar iterator, or a lambda that returns its input transparently. Try to do the right thing with multiprocessing--generate a pool if needed, but otherwise use single-threading (which is better for tracking errors)
Answer: not really. This is somewhat surprising...
Since I need to know whether something is on X pretty often, this seems worth spinning out.
Some version of ASEr adds a header line with the number of reads. So Ignore that.
It's actually a bit simpler to keep them as strings, and then I can just get a CLU's identity by .split()ing on colons
Notes from the week of 2/09/2018 will be especially helpful here. It seems like taking the autocorrelation at several different strides, then finding where the mean of those is non-zero turns up ~90 exons from ~30 genes with spatial splicing.
Print the stage numbers as well, so I can run multiple times and generate all the files without them clobbering each other
Including finding the correlation with maternal expression, and calculating a p-value for that correlation, since individual cases might be skewed by the spectrum of values.
Maybe I don't want 0 to be 0, but instead the minimum of the figure.
Conflicts: FindAutocorrPSI.py
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Both major (new splicing figure), and minor (smoother running on the cluster)