Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added CombSortTest.java #825

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jayyusi
Copy link

@jayyusi jayyusi commented Sep 14, 2019

copied over CombSort.java from master branch to Development branch.
Added CombSortTest.java to Development branch

copied over CombSort.java from master branch to Development branch.
Added CombSortTest.java to Development branch
Copy link

@mainrs mainrs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should fix some naming and formatting errors to match with Java's coding style.


class CombSortTest {

//One global combSort instance variable
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment can be removed, not really needed.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done.

//One global combSort instance variable
CombSort combSort = new CombSort();

//Integer Sort Test
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same goes here. The naming scheme of your methods should be testSomething. Like testIntegerSort and testStringSort. Methods in Java start with a lowercase letter. Make sure to correct that everywhere else too.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how about combSortIntegerTest ?

Copy link

@mainrs mainrs Sep 15, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, just change it to testStringSort and testIntegerSort. Your class is named CombSortTest already, no need to add it to the method names. Alongside that, all test methods from the other classes are named using the testXXX scheme. And to keep consistency it would be better if you could change them too :)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CycleSortTest class does not follow the consistency you mentioned ?!
it follows what I suggested :)
class CycleSortTest {

@Test
void cycleSortIntegerTest() {

    CycleSort cycleSort = new CycleSort();

Copy link

@mainrs mainrs Sep 15, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you take a look at all the other tests, they follow the convention testXXX where XXX gives some details of what is being tested. In your case, it would be testStringSort or something similar.

Edit:
Well, looks like some tests need a rename then :) They shouldn't be named like that though. Even the JUnit site lists the testXXX naming scheme as a go-to. And in all Java based open source projects I worked on they mostly used that scheme.

Well, I am in no position to force you to use it, I'm no member of this organisation. At least make the method names lowercase please. Because THAT is Java convention.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

haha, yes now you see what I mean, and now I see what you mean, I just noticed in the /search folder, the tests follow the naming convention of testXXX.

I did the changes, did you want me to also remove all the comments like this one:
//Integer Sort Test

I'm almost done, and thank you for the review and the edit suggestions. Its always good to have another pair of eyes. I admit I totally overlooked the method names.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be nice if you could remove any comments that don't really add value, yes. If they are needed to explain why a certain thing is done, let them in. But something like // Integer Sort test is not really needed.

No problem :)

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

alright, done.
I made a commit to the same pull request.
Do you know when will pull requests be merged with the development branch ?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It usually takes some time...


//compare the two results, our CombSort vs. Java's sort
Assertions.assertArrayEquals(array1,array2);

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove empty lines at the end of each method.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done.


//Integer Sort Test
@Test
void CombSortIntegerTest(){
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Method name, see above.


//String Sort Test
@Test
void CombSortStringTest(){
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Method name, see above.

removed unnecessary comments
removed blank lines at end of method
modified method names
@ayaankhan98
Copy link
Member

Hey please make PR to master branch.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants