Skip to content

Started alternate API for dictionaries #52

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 9, 2016
Merged

Started alternate API for dictionaries #52

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 9, 2016

Conversation

mwhelan
Copy link
Member

@mwhelan mwhelan commented Feb 11, 2016

Hey @robdmoore . I have converted half the API to have the category in between. I think it will work quite well but have not done the whole API until I've guaged feedback to see if it's the right direction to follow.

@mwhelan
Copy link
Member Author

mwhelan commented Feb 12, 2016

Properties get rid of the redundant () on each extension method. So, the choices of API so far are:

Any.AddressAusCity Any.AddressAus().City Any.AddressAus.City

@robdmoore
Copy link
Member

I prefer property.

I'm comfortable with the ones that come with dossier being "special" since when you create ones for your own domain it makes sense you'd put them directly against Any.

@robdmoore
Copy link
Member

I'm happy with this PR.

@robdmoore
Copy link
Member

@mwhelan I'm merging this so it can be released, but can you do another PR to talk about the [Obsolete] methods in the BREAKING_CHANGES file?

@robdmoore robdmoore merged commit b0fda3d into TestStack:master Aug 9, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants