Skip to content

Conversation

@okoklaile
Copy link

self.loss_in_round = false; //according to ietf,it should be set to false.
//see:https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cardwell-iccrg-bbr-congestion-control-02.html#name-updating-the-model-upon-pac
//BBRUpdateCongestionSignals():
// BBRUpdateMaxBw()
// if (rs.losses > 0)
// BBR.loss_in_round = 1
// if (!BBR.loss_round_start)
// return /* wait until end of round trip */
// BBRAdaptLowerBoundsFromCongestion()
// BBR.loss_in_round = 0

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.38%. Comparing base (2a57740) to head (0231408).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #450      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    95.36%   95.38%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files           50       50              
  Lines        34238    34238              
===========================================
+ Hits         32651    32657       +6     
+ Misses        1587     1581       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants