Hello,
I was about to comment the #130 but you closed it before I could. I'm reopening an issue on the topic:
do you think it's worth I submit a PR to add gibbs to the package ?
My motivation. This morning my solution to include 'gibbs' was a bit ugly. I've cleaned it. It is now very simple and it works well for gibbs. I can see that it could quite easily be generalized to the other missing functions.