Intgrate OPA

[tsinghammer]

Summary of the changes (Less than 80 chars)

• We would like to use Squadron in the HotChocolate project
• In order to completely switch, we need an OPA provider

Addresses 5541

[swisslife-bot]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ michaelstaib
❌ TassiloSinghammerVolue
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[glucaci]

Hi @tsinghammer,

Thanks for your contribution, but I'm not sure if this fits to Squadron. We have tried to create Squadron to support easy integration for most used storage and messaging dependencies.

For any other external dependencies which are available as a container image and you need in your tests you can use the GenericContainerResource. A simple example can be found here.

Regards!

[michaelstaib]

Why not? This was the main benefit for using squadron over things like test containers. Essentially having docker and cloud resources abstracted as nuget packages.