Skip to content

[pull] main from apache:main#39

Merged
pull[bot] merged 2 commits intoStars1233:mainfrom
apache:main
Apr 23, 2025
Merged

[pull] main from apache:main#39
pull[bot] merged 2 commits intoStars1233:mainfrom
apache:main

Conversation

@pull
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@pull pull bot commented Apr 23, 2025

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.1)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

Summary by Sourcery

Improve DataFusion's projection and distribution optimization with performance enhancements and new test coverage

Enhancements:

  • Refactored is_projection_unnecessary function to improve performance and accuracy of projection checks
  • Modified replace_order_preserving_variants to preserve fetch parameter when transforming execution plans

Tests:

  • Added a new test for replacing order-preserving merge variants with coalesce partitions
  • Introduced a benchmark to compare performance of projection unnecessary checks

Chores:

  • Updated Cargo.toml to include criterion for benchmarking
  • Added a new benchmark file for projection unnecessary checks

@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Apr 23, 2025
@pull pull bot merged commit 230f31b into Stars1233:main Apr 23, 2025
@gitstream-cm
Copy link
Copy Markdown

gitstream-cm bot commented Apr 23, 2025

🚨 gitStream Monthly Automation Limit Reached 🚨

Your organization has exceeded the number of pull requests allowed for automation with gitStream.
Monthly PRs automated: 7974/250

To continue automating your PR workflows and unlock additional features, please contact LinearB.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sourcery-ai bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request includes changes to the is_projection_unnecessary function in datafusion/optimizer/src/optimize_projections/mod.rs to improve its efficiency and correctness. It also adds a test case to verify that SortPreservingMergeExec with fetch is correctly transformed to CoalescePartitionsExec and that the fetch value is preserved. Finally, a benchmark is added to compare the performance of the old and new is_projection_unnecessary functions.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added a test case to verify that SortPreservingMergeExec with fetch is correctly transformed to CoalescePartitionsExec and that the fetch value is preserved.
  • Added a new test function test_replace_order_preserving_variants_with_fetch.
  • Created a base plan with parquet_exec.
  • Created a SortPreservingMergeExec with fetch=5.
  • Created a DistributionContext.
  • Applied the replace_order_preserving_variants function.
  • Verified that the plan was transformed to CoalescePartitionsExec.
  • Verified that the fetch value was preserved after the transformation.
datafusion/core/tests/physical_optimizer/enforce_distribution.rs
Refactored the is_projection_unnecessary function to improve its efficiency and correctness.
  • Modified the is_projection_unnecessary function to first check if the number of expressions is equal to the number of fields in the input schema.
  • Modified the is_projection_unnecessary function to check if each expression is a column and if it matches the field name and relation.
  • Removed the check for trivial expressions.
  • Removed the call to projection_schema.
datafusion/optimizer/src/optimize_projections/mod.rs
Exposed the replace_order_preserving_variants function as public.
  • Changed the visibility of the replace_order_preserving_variants function to public.
datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/enforce_distribution.rs
Modified the replace_order_preserving_variants function to preserve the fetch value when transforming to CoalescePartitionsExec.
  • Modified the replace_order_preserving_variants function to use with_fetch when creating the CoalescePartitionsExec.
datafusion/physical-optimizer/src/enforce_distribution.rs
Added a benchmark to compare the performance of the old and new is_projection_unnecessary functions.
  • Added a new benchmark file datafusion/optimizer/benches/projection_unnecessary.rs.
  • Created a function create_plan_with_many_exprs to create a logical plan with many expressions.
  • Created a benchmark group projection_unnecessary_comparison.
  • Added benchmarks for both the old and new is_projection_unnecessary functions.
datafusion/optimizer/Cargo.toml
datafusion/optimizer/benches/projection_unnecessary.rs

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant