Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Fix compaction flat json crash #51307

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Seaven
Copy link
Contributor

@Seaven Seaven commented Sep 24, 2024

Why I'm doing:

check condition lose

What I'm doing:

Fixes https://github.com/StarRocks/StarRocksTest/issues/8606

What type of PR is this:

  • BugFix
  • Feature
  • Enhancement
  • Refactor
  • UT
  • Doc
  • Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

  • Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
  • No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

  • Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
  • Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
  • Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
  • Feature removed
  • Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

  • I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
  • This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
    • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
  • This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

  • I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
    • 3.3
    • 3.2
    • 3.1
    • 3.0
    • 2.5

Signed-off-by: Seaven <seaven_7@qq.com>
@Seaven Seaven requested review from a team as code owners September 24, 2024 06:52
@mergify mergify bot assigned Seaven Sep 24, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 3.3 label Sep 24, 2024
Copy link

[FE Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[Java-Extensions Incremental Coverage Report]

pass : 0 / 0 (0%)

Copy link

[BE Incremental Coverage Report]

fail : 3 / 8 (37.50%)

file detail

path covered_line new_line coverage not_covered_line_detail
🔵 be/src/storage/meta_reader.cpp 0 4 00.00% [247, 248, 267, 268]
🔵 be/src/column/json_column.cpp 1 2 50.00% [78]
🔵 be/src/util/json_flattener.cpp 2 2 100.00% []

@@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ std::string append_read_name(const ColumnReader* col_reader) {
for (const auto& sub_reader : *col_reader->sub_readers()) {
stream << fmt::format("{}({}), ", sub_reader->name(), type_to_string(sub_reader->column_type()));
}
return stream.str().substr(0, stream.view().size() - 2);
auto str = stream.str();
return str.substr(0, str.size() - 2);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why not sstring::view()?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Seaven Seaven Sep 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

need c++20, some env doesn't support

@wyb wyb enabled auto-merge (squash) September 24, 2024 11:16
@kangkaisen kangkaisen disabled auto-merge September 24, 2024 12:58
@kangkaisen kangkaisen merged commit 1ab795f into StarRocks:main Sep 24, 2024
76 of 80 checks passed
Copy link

@Mergifyio backport branch-3.3

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the 3.3 label Sep 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Sep 24, 2024

backport branch-3.3

✅ Backports have been created

mergify bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 24, 2024
Signed-off-by: Seaven <seaven_7@qq.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1ab795f)
wanpengfei-git pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
renzhimin7 pushed a commit to renzhimin7/starrocks that referenced this pull request Nov 7, 2024
Signed-off-by: Seaven <seaven_7@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: zhiminr.ren <1240388654@qq.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants